The documentation http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Protocol.pdf says, re S+P: "Here “best potential QSO partner” means “New Multiplier” (1st priority) or “New Call on Band” (2nd priority)."
Now it seems to me that "New Call" implies "New Call on Band", and so should qualify as a potential QSO partner. However, in my setup, it does not. (That is, a new call on the band can trigger the S+P response; while entirely new call, i.e. new on all bands, doesn't.) 73, Paul K6PO P.S. I'm posting this as a reply to George's note, since its topic fits his subject line. Just doing my part to try to keep comments here organized a bit. I do not know how the developers continue to maintain their sanity without a proper bug reporting and tracking system. On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 7:45 AM WB5JJJ <wb5...@gmail.com> wrote: > Trying new features with FT4 and noticed that when S+P is active during > non-CQ (receive only) operation, it will pounce on stations using directed > calls such as CQ DX WB5JJJ EM35. In a contest situation, which FT4 is > designed for, this would be fine since there will not be any directed CQ's > typically. So, should this option not be shown on the main UI unless a > contest is selected since it can cause frustration to some operators that > don't want to be bothered by local stations pouncing on their directed CQ? > > Judging from some comments, it appears that FT4 may be the new norm for > those seeking their first WAS, DXCC and not just contests. > > WB5JJJ - George > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
