Backwards compatibility is a thing ... Also, if the new version of the software knows how to decode an older encoding, you already have an implied version number.
It's not like this takes eons to decode, nothing wrong with trying several times, newest version first, next version next and so on. -- finger painting on glass is an inexact art - apologies for any errors in this scra^Hibble ()/)/)() ..ASCII for Onno.. On Fri., 10 May 2019, 16:11 Reino Talarmo, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Onno, > > >A better idea is to include a protocol version number in the QSO > information, that way both sides have a chance to alert the operator. > > > > A nice idea, but that information needs to be sent using the lower layer > of the previous protocol version…. > > 73, Reino, oh3ma > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
