Hi Joe,
Thank you for your answer.
Cheers
Serge
On 09/08/2019 00:36, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Serge,
On 8/8/2019 17:31, Serge F6BHK wrote:
at the dawn of WSJT-X we had the choice to decode JT65+JT9 under the
same combo value. I remember I found it very useful. When I
double-clicked a JT65 signal then I was sending using JT65, same for
JT9.
would'nt it be nice to have a FT8+FT4 combo value that decode both of
the protocols and set the Xmit side of WSJT-X accordingly?
Because their T/R sequence lengths are different, FT4 and FT8 are not
amenable to the convenient dual-mode decoding scheme that was useful
for JT65 and JT9.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
--
73, de Serge
F6BHK, ex-VR2LL, G5BHT, FM5GC
DEYRAS, JN24IX, ARDECHE
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
