Just over a year now and no reply.. Could we be notified at a bare minimum if Tx 6 is being transmitted and its contents are in the existing status message or a new one?
Author of GridTracker - Stephen "Tag" Loomis / N0TTL On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 6:50 PM Mike Maynard <m...@k2gc.net> wrote: > Bill, > > From what I can tell, it looks like Stephen is just trying to get the > actual currently transmitting packet. This would be an operational aid - > for example: It would allow a developer the ability to create a status > screen that is much easier to see (maybe larger type? different > contrasting colors, etc). > > Obviously it would not allow for any change in QSO progression. That > would still require direct intervention with WSJT. > > In my setup... I have a keypad that I programmed to set the QSO > progression using hot-keys. the screen I run WSJT on is a little hard to > read at a glance. It takes time to focus on it where it is. Sure I could > adjust my resolution, but then I lose space on the screen for other things. > > A larger display of current WSJT status could be a welcome option to some > of us with poorer eyesight. Enabling such a UDP packet would allow such > development to happen. > > Thanks > Mike > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 4:39 PM Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> > wrote: > >> On 21/02/2019 21:02, Tag Loomis wrote: >> >> First time message to the group. >> >> Would it be possible to have the current transmitting message be emitted >> in either in the Status Out message after “Special operation mode (quint8)” >> as utf8 *OR* a brand new message type? >> >> If it’s already present and I’m just not seeing it, any pointer would be >> great! >> >> Thank you for your time! >> >> Stephen Loomis / N0TTL / GridTracker developer. >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> welcome to the group. >> >> The WSJT-X UDP protocol is meant to aid the WSJT-X operator but with the >> expectation that QSOs will be progressed from with WSJT-X by user >> interaction with the software. Because of that a message that echoes the >> current outgoing message doesn't seem to add any value. Can you please >> explain in detail how such a message would be used? >> >> 73 >> Bill >> G4WJS. >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> > > > -- > Mike > K2GC > www.k2gc.net > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
