Hi Bill, Thanks for that tip !
I had been advised that you had merged your fork of Hamlib back into the main fold – with suggestions that only the official Hamlib releases should be used for WSJT-X code – hence scripts with the “experimental code” for making JTSDK 3.0 (x86 compile) and 3.1 (x64 compile) work documented at “jt...@groups.io<mailto:jt...@groups.io>” (Google that to find the address) were set that way ! I have noted that Mike W9MDB has achieved some amazing things of late with the mater releases of HAMLIB – in particular having it compiler-error free without turning compiler switches off … This is almost unheard of in terms of any software development (so well done Mike) !!!! Firstly, will source be released with the 2.2.0 rc1 candidate proposed to be released sometime today? Secondly and important if source is proposed to be released, can you please offer some guidance now pre-release for the excited community that work with the JTSDK with regards to preferred CMAKE, FFTW, Qt etc. versions? As we know there are some differences between Qt versions and facilities that they offer and deprecate ! [ I would assume that Qt would be “set” at the latest LTS (3 year support) version being Qt 5.12.8 … although the “experiment” scripts that I have shared demonstrate how to set to and fall back to Qt 5.14.2 (the latest release) as default. ] 73 and thanks, Steve I VK3VM / VK3SIR From: Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> Sent: Sunday, 10 May 2020 7:59 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Coming soon: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1 On 10/05/2020 10:51, Claude Frantz wrote: On 5/5/20 6:17 PM, Joe Taylor wrote: This message is to let you know of some important WSJT-X development plans. We plan to make a first candidate release of WSJT-X 2.2.0 next Monday, May 10. WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1 will be a beta-quality release candidate providing a number of new features and capabilities. Hi Bill & all, Which releases of hamlib can be used to compile ? Is the use of the special wsjt style hamlib mandatory ? What are the differences vs. "standard" hamlib ? Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) Hi Claude, although it is still recommended to use my fork of Hamlib, currently my fork integration branch is the same as its master branch which in turn is close to the current Hamlib master branch at commit 320b2552. 73 Bill G4WJS.
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
