Great... Working as designed.
AL, K0VM

On 5/14/2020 10:18 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 14/05/2020 15:55, Al wrote:
Just FWIW...

I have set up a test where I have 2.2.0-RC1 and 2.1.2 running in parallel on the same PC from the same audio source. I notice that the SNR reported by 2.2.0-RC1 is consistently more optimistic  vs. 2.1.2.  In some cases up to 13db greater on strong signals. Most signals report at least a few db greater.

Just an observation..

AL, K0VM

Hi Al,

it's no so much optimistic as accurate. v2.2.0 introduces a window filter on the FFT that is used for noise estimation, it greatly reduces bias from strong signals in the pass band. You should notice that the SNR of strong signals is not compressed anywhere near as much as previous versions, e..g. you may see SNR values above +20 being far more accurate and they may extend up to +50 or more.

73
Bill
G4WJS.



_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to