Bill,

Ø  Similarly a priori decoding based on the DX Call field are disabled by 
clearing the DX call field. If you are going to leave WSJT-X unattended then 
clearing the DX Call field is a good idea.

Thanks for that. Noted. It is fully noted and makes sense. Some observations 
had occurred after periods of long “inactivity” … but they may have more 
frequently occurred after a long silent period then activity (and I’ll watch 
for this further).

Many of us do leave WSJT-X unattended whether it be for WSPR or just plain 
reporting/helping others with propagation “estimations” via 
https://pskreporter.info  .

I will post one observation that appears to back your comments above - it just 
occurred a few seconds ago after I changed from 40m to 20m. It has been sitting 
at 40m for around 6 hrs, then a change:

200514_205030     7.074 Rx FT8    -17  0.0 1614 RA2FCL BH3PTL OM99
200514_205130     7.074 Rx FT8    -17  0.1 1614 RA2FCL BH3PTL OM99
200514_205315    14.074 Rx FT8    -18  0.2 2307 N4PHH KS4R RR73            <== 
FREQUENCY CHANGE
200514_205415    14.074 Rx FT8     -5  0.1 2360 SQ9UM VK9NK RG30
200514_205415    14.074 Rx FT8    -19  0.1  735 CQ VK7XX QE38                   
      a1
200514_205445    14.074 Rx FT8     -8  0.1 2359 SQ9UM VK9NK RG30
200514_205445    14.074 Rx FT8    -19  0.2 2307 CQ KS4R DM43                    
      a1
200514_205515    14.074 Rx FT8     -7  0.1 2360 SQ9UM VK9NK RG30
200514_205515    14.074 Rx FT8    -16  0.1  735 KF5RRX VK7XX RR73
200514_205530    14.074 Tx FT8      0  0.0  703 CQ VK3VM QF11
200514_205545    14.074 Rx FT8    -10  0.1 2360 SQ9UM VK9NK RG30
200514_205545    14.074 Rx FT8    -12  0.1  735 KF5RRX VK7XX RR73
200514_205545    14.074 Rx FT8    -20  0.2 2307 SV5DKL KS4R DM43
200514_205545    14.074 Rx FT8    -24  2.4 1882 VK3VM KP0VKB R AA86             
    ? a2
200514_205600    14.074 Tx FT8      0  0.0  703 KP0VKB VK3VM RR73
200514_205615    14.074 Rx FT8     -9  0.1 2360 CQ VK9NK RG30

I won’t post the recording as it is unnecessary to do so; I just played it back 
under 2.2 and “the main fork” and no false decodes !

But perhaps clearing the DX field on a detected frequency change (or the 
ability to set this as a configuration option) may be in order for 
investigation?

I can perceive this being a difficult one to overcome.

73

Steve I
VK3VM / VK3SIR


_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to