Folks,

I am only responding here as I have had a few emails in the background ... and 
I put this out there to guide learning for some... for many this will be old 
hat news !

There has been a lot of work take place with Hamlib since R 2.2.2 was released. 
WSJTX relies heavily on Hamlib.

The packages of Hamlib used to compile and release the precompiled versions on 
release at https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx.html are built to 
versions of Hamlib that are snapshotted within the source tarball  found within 
the source distribution found at 
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-2.2.2.tgz . 

Bill G4WJS's maintains a repository at git://git.code.sf.net/u/bsomervi/hamlib 
that is used to standardise WSJTX development; all documentation within the 
WSJTX source tarball refers to Bill's repository. Bill's repository may or may 
not currently be synchronised with the code in the release tarball. Bill may be 
able to provide further guidance on this for those of us that are developing 
software. Yet it's a very sound programing practise to base bug-reporting off 
known snapshots of libraries.

The "Master" live development Hamlib repository can be found at 
https://git.code.sf.net/p/hamlib/code . This is "bleeding edge" code as some 
would define it.

I can foresee that Mike W9MDB and the Hamlib team are aiming to work to slating 
a formal Hamlib 4.0 release (superseding the 3.3 release around in most places).

For WSJTX the preferred repo is that which Bill G4WJS maintains at 
git://git.code.sf.net/u/bsomervi/hamlib  :-) 

Based on Mike's email (and for ongoing development, debugging, compatibility 
testing etc.) the "Master " repo should be used. You just replace references 
referred to in the WSJTX INSTALL readme file that refer to Bill's repo (i.e. 
git://git.code.sf.net/u/bsomervi/hamlib ) with those for the "Master" repo 
(i.e. https://git.code.sf.net/p/hamlib/code ).

All is easy if you are compiling with Linux and Linux variants ... But for 
Windows compiles to the latest Hamlib source the simplest way is to use Greg 
KI7MT's JTSDK's. There is complexity here as there has been no formal 
maintenance of the Windows JTSDK's for 12 months.

The JTSDK 3.0 as delivered/documented on the JTSDK download site (i.e. 
https://sourceforge.net/projects/jtsdk/ ) should compile a 32-bit Windows wsjtx 
... There are some "patches" if you review the posts on [email protected] (Google 
search that as it is not an email address - i.e. https://groups.io/g/JTSDK ) if 
you want to compile your own Windows WSJTX using the "Master" repository.

JTSDK 3.1 is also available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/jtsdk/ - but in 
order to "work easily" and "behave" just like the JTSDK 3.0 it needs a series 
of "experiment" patches posted at [email protected]. The README file attached 
with the "Experiment" scripts allow for configuration options to be set to be 
able to pull from the "preferred" WSJTX repo - Bill Somerville's Repository, 
the "Master" Hamlib Repository or even not to pull from a repository at all 
(and use the packaged Hamlib snapshot packaged in the WSJTX source).

The best guidance for Mike W9MDB and the Hamlib team would be provided from 
people that are compiling their own Hamlib and WSJTX (and perhaps other 
software such as the FL-software) and not those using pre-compiled software or 
standardised library snapshots. 

Can I recommend that if you are responding to Mike's call please specify if you 
are using "new" Hamlib source or if you are using packaged WSJTX source and/or 
distributions?

If you need help please ask or post here or respond directly via email. If you 
need help compiling WSJTX for yourself then please peruse the JTSDK @ GROUPS.IO 
site at https://groups.io/g/JTSDK  first [ Note: as I have been using it as a 
blog to help as many as I possibly can and to avoid repetition as many cannot 
post here due to the lack of maintenance at that site ].

HAM - Help All mankind. We are here to help and progress learning. I also hope 
that the intent of this post is clear and that it is to help.

73

Steve I
VK3VM / VK3SIR

-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Berg <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, 16 July 2020 6:43 PM
To: Black Michael <[email protected]>; WSJT software development 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig verification

Re: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
>   3009  Icom                   IC-706                  20200614.0      
> Untested    RIG_MODEL_IC706

My 706 (no mk something) works flawlessly.

(I used to get "rig communication problem" popups, but these are rare now and I 
think the problem is in the USB serial adapter not coping with HF, and not in 
the rig.)

Christoph


_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to