HI Bill,

  In terms of basic strategy,  I've moved away from the "One big complex 
computer does everything" model towards a bunch of standalone Linux 
"appliances" that do a small number of tasks.

  My JT machines are up 24x7.   I'm also partially off grid (Via a homebrew 
solar setup), so night-time power consumption is a factor, although not a deal 
breaker.)

  For the JT modes,  I run:

 Primary Station:  Atomic Pi  (Atom Quad Core processor with 2gb  running 
Ubuntu (*)  
https://www.amazon.com/Atomic-Pi-High-Speed-Peripheral/dp/B07N298F2B/ref=sr_1_4?dchild=1&keywords=atomic+pi&qid=1623237717&sr=8-4

I prefer this over raspberry pi due to the huge heatsink which allows passive 
cooling.

  For 85% of my operations, this is fine, but on busy bands,  it sometimes 
takes more than 15 seconds to decode a 15 second interval, which is a path to 
ruin... 🙂    I've been chased off 20 meters a few times due to being unable to 
decode fast enough.   (I stubbornly run deep decoding  though so I don't miss 
stuff.)

*I know you didn't ask about OS,  but this flavor of ubuntu may not upgrade 
well.   (I already hit a snag building the new version due to libboost etc. and 
may need to either rebuild on a new distro, or abandon this configuration at 
some point.


 Secondary:   I also have 2 4gb Raspberry PI 4's running SDR ->GQRX/wsjtx that 
continuously listen on wspr.


--al
WB1BQE
________________________________
From: Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 11:38 PM
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Call for information about PC systems being used for 
WSJT-X

Hi all WSJT-X users,

we are looking into some performance enhancements that will take
advantage of some parallel processing features of modern CPU
architectures. In order to gauge how much backwards compatibility for
older CPUs we will have to implement it would help to know who is using
such older processors. Please don't turn this thread in to a mine is
better than yours conversation, all I need to know is who or how many of
you are using the older CPU architectures. Note that this applies to MS
Windows, Intel Linux, and Intel macOS users, it is about CPUs not
operating systems.

The technology we will use is called AVX and that is present on all
Intel CPUs branded Core i3/i5/i7/i9 (circa 2010 to present), it is also
present on AMD CPUs since the Jaguar or Puma based CPU models (some late
Athlon-II CPUs, all Zen based CPUs, including Ryzen) circa 2013 to present.

Notably Intel CPUs branded Celeron, Pentium, or Atom do not support the
AVX technology.

So in summary, look up your CPU and if it **does not support AVX**
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions) then let me
know.

73
Bill
G4WJS.



_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to