On 15/09/2021 4:27 pm, Saku via wsjt-devel wrote:
f wsjt-x decode is set to "Normal" or "Deep" I would rather say "slightly better, in some cases".
That has been my experience as well. On the surface JTDX offers a greater number of decodes, but many were false decodes.
If JTDX is truly offering superior decoding have any patches been submitted to the wsjtx dev-team by the jtdx people?
de Laurie VK3AMA _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel