On 15/09/2021 4:27 pm, Saku via wsjt-devel wrote:
f wsjt-x decode is set to "Normal" or "Deep" I would rather say "slightly better, in some cases".

That has been my experience as well. On the surface JTDX offers a greater number of decodes, but many were false decodes.

If JTDX is truly offering superior decoding have any patches been submitted to the wsjtx dev-team by the jtdx people?

de Laurie VK3AMA



_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to