In developing wsprdaemon I sought to emulate the WSPR decode operation as
closely as possible.
So after observing that WSJT-x invoked  wsprd with "-C 500', I made that
the default for WD's use of wsprd.
I would welcome suggestions about the optimal set of this and wsprd
parameters, and at WD isites t would be easy to quantify the performance
effects of such changes.

On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 12:25 PM Daniele Forsi via wsjt-devel <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Jim wrote:
>
> > my thought on the 500 was something someone else told me...
> >
> > I'll look at the source code
>
> 500 is not the default value, but it's the value used in the
> invocation of wsprd made by wsjt-x; I can see it in the status line
> (see image attached)
>
> in my local git checkout the code apparently is at line 1612:
> widgets/mainwindow.cpp:1611:      if((m_ndepth&7)==2) depth_args <<
> "-C" << "500" << "-o" << "4"; //3 pass, subtract, Block detection, OSD
> widgets/mainwindow.cpp:1612:      if((m_ndepth&7)==3) depth_args <<
> "-C" << "500"  << "-o" << "4" << "-d"; //3 pass, subtract, Block
> detect, OSD, more candidates
>
> --
> 73 de IU5HKX Daniele
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>


-- 
Rob Robinett
AI6VN
[email protected]
mobile: +1 650 218 8896
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to