All, I am afraid of current situation where there is no response to my proposal written below.
I guess it is caused by my poor description in English and poor sentence structure addressing the issues. Therefore, I am happy if somebody raise his/her questions for the purpose of clarification. BTW, this proposal is quite different topic from “Fox Mode Indication to Hound Users on the Air” which I uploaded at the same time. I am waiting the response soon. Regards, take de JA5AEA Windows の メール<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> から送信 差出人: Tsutsumi Takehiko<mailto:ja5...@outlook.com> 送信日時: 2022年11月8日 13:38 宛先: WSJT software development<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 件名: Fox sends "DUPE" instead of "+rpt" in DX pedition mode Hi, Concerning the following protocol item 13, I understand WSJT-X developers decided so respecting on traditional DX-pedition practice about logging behavior. --------------------------------------------------------------Page 5 of FT8 DX-pedition Mode User Guide-------------------------------------------------------------- 13. When Fox receives your “R+rpt” message he responds with “RR73”. At this point he considers your QSO complete and logs it. When you receive “RR73” you should log it, too ! 14. If for some reason a Hound fails to copy an RR73 sent by Fox, that Hound will repeat his transmission of Tx 3 (“R+rpt”). Fox will respond to such “R+rpt” messages by sending “RR73” up to three times. --------------------------------------------------------------Page 5 of FT8 DX-pedition Mode User Guide-------------------------------------------------------------- However, it is a fact that it creates following side-effects under real DX-pedition equipment and environment limitation which makes their signal weak and therefore the protocol item 14 becomes normal situation. 1. Creates uncertainty to Hound users whether “Fox log” was included their QSO without receiving “RR73” message. 2. Repeated Hound calls following protocol item 14 occupies Hound allocated spectrum and creates unnecessary QRMs. To avoid the above side-effects, would you consider to add transmission of dupe message such as “DUPE” instead of “+rpt” message to these Hounds if Fox program detects repeated dupe calls after protocol item 14? It is also nice if Hound program detects “DUPE” message, it automatically stops further calls. Regards, take de JA5AEA Windows の メール<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> から送信
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
