Hi Jon,

I don’t see any hash collision in those messages. You should ask what W1WW/0 
did? Perhaps operator was waiting a “73” from your, but you sent one to W1WW/3 
and W1WW/0 decided to send you a new report. I don’t know whether that station 
received your message at 205445 as you changed it to W1WW/7 at 205448. Could be 
possible! In any case both station sent to you “RR73”.
73, Reino OH3mA

 

From: Jon Anhold via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] 
Sent: 20. tammikuutata 2023 22:56
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Jon Anhold <j...@anhold.com>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Hashed callsign collisions?

 

I was just on 20m trying to work W1AW/7, and W1AW/0 answered me, twice - is 
this a known issue with longer/hashed callsigns?

 



 

73 de KM8V Jon

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to