Thanks Joe for QSO and the confirmation that Q65-15A is not to be used for EME. Our “bad” in that in our circles we may have been referring to it as broken.
The attached article details some of the testing that has occurred to date in an attempt to work with what we have. I guess the EME community (including me) are looking for a faster QSO where conditions and equipment support it? Regards Dwayne AB6A > On Jan 22, 2024, at 11:54 AM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > > Hi Dwayne, > > Thanks for the QSO with W2ZQ, last evening. > > Who is saying Q65-15A is broken, and why? > > Are you (or they?) talking about EME? If so, are you aware that the Q65-15x > submodes are not supposed to work for EME. The 2.5 s EME delay is too large. > > -- 73, Joe, K1JT > >> On 1/22/2024 2:04 PM, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel wrote: >> There have been ongoing reports from various operators best summarized in >> the post attached that Q65-15A is “broken”. What is current consensus on >> this and if it is broken, is there any plans to address the issues? >> Q65-15A Part II Testing and Sensitivity Bob Atkins - KA1GT >> <https://www.bobatkins.com/radio/Q65-15_eme_II.html> >> bobatkins.com <https://www.bobatkins.com/radio/Q65-15_eme_II.html> >> favicon.ico <https://www.bobatkins.com/radio/Q65-15_eme_II.html> >> <https://www.bobatkins.com/radio/Q65-15_eme_II.html> >> Regards Dwayne AB6A >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
