Hasan, Did you actually take the time to read **and understand** the blog post I linked, and the contents of the similar discussions (linked below) regarding the superfox binaries in the mailing list?
https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/mailman/wsjt-devel/thread/ZoMmzGysLjXJ5B2O%40msg.df7cb.de/#msg58790775 https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/mailman/wsjt-devel/thread/CAH3sL-bVdgxXz44T1U%2BCVvi9rXCfwur%2BoM-ws7yKcZkAw1u3Fw%40mail.gmail.com/#msg58797048 Jonath*a*n, GI3JMC On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 12:59 PM Hasan N0AN <hbasri.schie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jonathon, > Then don't use SuperFox > Hasan > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 5:25 AM Jonathan McComb via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2024/07/24/superflawed/ >> >> The Superfox mode uses security by obscurity, (which is never a good >> thing) by failing to publish any source code for the dedicated superfox >> binaries to allow for peer review. It is exceptionally misguided. >> >> Amateur Radio should be available to everyone to use, without having >> software functions/features hidden behind a gatekeeping organisation >> (Northern California DX Foundation). A more cynical person would surmise >> that this is a first step to making the feature a paid one. >> >> Jonathan, GI3JMC >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
