thx for the hint. as long as it works, i don't care about package names. i found it a bit confusing, since the file-system example genereates such tidy code
Aleksander Slominski wrote: > Campana Jr., Salvatore J wrote: > >> The ugly class names you refer to are XmlBean-internals...Its not mean >> for you, its for them....Thats part of the reason we generate a jar.... >> >> All your classes' packages are based on the namespace pf your wsdl...as >> are the generated XmlBeans (except for things they don't expect you to >> mess with)... >> >> In short, this is done by XmlBeans...not us... >> > by using ,xsdconfig file you can map namespaces to package name of > your choosing (this is described in XmlBeans documentation) - that > should work at least in theory .... > > best, > > alek > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Wolfgang Schreiner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: >> Friday, October 21, 2005 1:47 PM >> To: wsrf-user@ws.apache.org >> Subject: Re: wsdl2java >> >> thanx very much for your support! >> well, that's what i didn't take care of ... now i got rid of multiple >> methods but i still get those ugly package names: >> >> public static final org.apache.xmlbeans.SchemaType type = >> (org.apache.xmlbeans.SchemaType)schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans.system.sB1E943 >> 80FFBC6C791A4A2862E0470F74.TypeSystemHolder.typeSystem.resolveHandle("re >> sourceproperties3cc2doctype"); >> >> in the generated xml-beans >> does this also happen due to modified namespaces (putting aside the fact >> that they are just pointing to http-urls instead to the local file >> system)? this is strange, since i do not see any major differences ... >> >> >> >> Campana Jr., Salvatore J wrote: >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
