+1 .. I'd like to see TSIK broken up a bit more (and maybe appropriate parts moved to commons even?).
Sanjiva. On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 11:16 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Hans, > > [CC'ing wss4j-dev mailing list] > > Can we make/keep TSIK a soap engine agnostic toolkit (remove the > soap/transport stuff)? Then we can then position WSS4J as a project > for implementing ws-security in specific soap engines like JAX-RPC, > Axis 1.X and Axis 2.X. > > I'd also highly recommend abstracting out portions of WSS4J behind an > interface/factory such that we can plugin in TSIK based implementation > (and keep the existing implementation for some time since folks depend > on existing behavior). This way we can have implement OASIS > WS-Security 1.1 just in TSIK and automatically get WSS4J upgraded > instead of writing it twice. Same goes for say Kerberos token profile > or other profiles that we think are important. > > What do you think? > > thanks, > dims > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
