Dims,
I am not working on the WSS4J source from the CVS
repository. I pull out part of the code that is
Axis independent and work on that part. Thus, I
cannot use log4j to get the time. Instead, I directly
measure the time by
long runTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
try{
WSS4JHandler.processMessage(smc, true);
} catch (WSSecurityException ex){
System.out.println(ex.getStackTrace());
}
runTime = System.currentTimeMillis() -
runTime;
Any thing wrong with the way to calculate the time?
Thanks,
Jian
--- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are u really sure? Can you switch on debug for
> timing in
> log4j.properties to measure the time?
>
> log4j.logger.org.apache.ws.security.TIME=DEBUG
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 10/13/05, Fang Jian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks, Dustin.
> >
> > Yes, I use BountyCastle provider. The time
> includes
> > the whole WSS4J handler processing time. The
> following
> > message is encrypted and signed:
> >
> > <soapenv:Body>
> > <ns2:addNumbers
> xmlns:ns2="http://jtv.com";>
> > <number1>10</number1>
> > <number2>20</number2>
> > </ns2:addNumbers>
> > </soapenv:Body>
> >
> > It took 5281ms for my linux box (Dell latitude
> D610)
> > in my unit test. It seems not practical for real
> > system design. Thus, I really like to know the
> general
> > speed performance of WSS4J + Apache XML security.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jian
> >
> > --- Dustin Breese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This may be a dumb question since I'm new to the
> > > group (and WS
> > > security overall), but doesn't a lot depend on
> which
> > > JCE provider you
> > > are using? For example, if you are using
> > > BountyCastle or some other
> > > provider?
> > >
> > > Also, does your timing include setting up the
> > > engine? Are you
> > > encrypting the entire SOAP body or just parts of
> it?
> > >
> > > -Dustin
> > >
> > > On 10/13/05, Fang Jian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I tested the encryption with RSA and the
> signature
> > > > with RSA-SHA1. It seems to me that the
> processing
> > > > speed is really slow. For encryption, it can
> take
> > > up
> > > > to 4~5 seconds to encrypt the soap message
> body.
> > > >
> > > > Since speed performance is critical to real
> > > system. I
> > > > would like to know if there are any deployed
> real
> > > > systems that utilize WSS4J. How is the speed
> > > > performance? Is there any way to improve the
> speed
> > > > performance?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > >
> > > > Jian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Yahoo! Music Unlimited
> > > > Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
> > > > http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! Music Unlimited
> > Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
> > http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
