Hi Christian, Werner, I was the one who made that svn commit.
I ran into an interop scenario (action="Timestamp UsernameToken") where it needed the wsu:Id s to be present on both the tokens even though they were not referenced. This change adds a wsu:Id ALL the time even when they are not referenced. I checked this in coz this may be useful for WSS4J in terms of interoperability, and it didn't harm any of the existing functionality. But maybe ideally we should add a switch to turn on wsu:Id even when the token (UsernameToken or Timestamp) is not referenced. What do you guys think? Thanks and regards, Ruchith On 1/17/06, Christian Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Werner! > > Thanks for the hint. It works great. > > I meant the following mailing list entry: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-fx-dev/200509.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > > Regards, > Christian > > P.S. Please, call me Christian... ;o) > > > On 1/16/06, Werner Dittmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Christina, > > > > sure you can sign a Timestamp, in fact you can sign any element > > in a request message. Please have a look at the "signatureParts" > > parameter - described in the WSHandlerConstants java file (run > > Javadoc on the source or in the documents tree of the binary > > distribution). This parameters is available since the first > > versions of WSS4J. > > > > BTW, to which function do you refer that was added after 4th of > > September? > > > > Regards, > > Werner > > > > Christian Müller wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > > > In my project, i need the functionality to signed the timestamp. This > > > functionality was added at 04 Sept., after version 1.1.0 was released... > :o( > > > When comes the next version? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Christian > > > > > > -- Ruchith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
