I expected this answer :) it's going to be a little difficult, because this way I am asking my consumers the same "use products that support WS-Policy" and I am dictating their decisions, which I do not like. However, I know tools are getting better and better, so this is not going to be an issue in a near feature I hope.
thanks, Stan --- Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WS-Policy. (i.e., use products that support WS-Policy) > > On 4/27/06, Stanley Stanev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Anne, > > > > I am with you! > > > > first, WS-Policy has limited support yet > > second, shouldn't define our headers in the WSDL > > > > then, do you have an idea todays, how do we expose and in what form the > > bits > > that the infrastructure is responsible for implementing (i.e. headers) to > > the > > consumers > > > > thanks, > > Stan > > > > --- Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Stanley, > > > > > > The WSDL should define the bits that the application code needs to know > > > about. It should *not* define the bits that the infrastructure (e.g., > > > handlers and intermediaries) is responsible for implementing (i.e ., > > > headers). The infrastructure requirements should be defined using > > WS-Policy. > > > > > > > > > Now, admittedly, WS-Policy is not yet a standard, and it has limited > > support > > > by application platforms, but that doesn't change the fact that you > > really > > > shouldn't define your headers in the WSDL. > > > > > > By the way -- yesterday W3C acknowlegded the submission of the WS-Policy > > > specifications (WS-Policy and WS-PolicyAttachments). > > > See http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/06/ . > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/27/06, Ruchith Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Stanley, > > > > > > > > On 4/27/06, Stanley Stanev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > yes, that's what I was referring > > > > > > > > > > I aksed Axis already, but do you know by chance if I am able to > > generate > > > > a WSDL > > > > > that contains my own implicit headers using Axis 1.x? > > > > > > > > I don't think you can generate such a WSDL with Axis 1.x where is > > > > defines headers to be included .... maybe an Axis 1.x expert can > > > > please correct me on this of I'm wrong? (CCed to Axis-user list) > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ruchith > > > > Stanimir Stanev (Stanley) > > Senior Java Developer > > Momentum SI, Austin TX > > http://www.momentumsi.com > > http://www.stanev.com > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > Stanimir Stanev (Stanley) Senior Java Developer Momentum SI, Austin TX http://www.momentumsi.com http://www.stanev.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
