Sure thing! Thanks Dims! - Dan
On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, you do have the authority :) For WSS-45, Can you have both constructors? (and deprecate the one with properties?) thanks, dims On 3/15/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola WSS4Jers > > I would like to get two patches integrated into the WSS4J sometime soon. I > think as a WS committer I have authority to do this myself (or so people > like Dims tell me ;-)), but I thought I would check to see if there were a) > any objections to me doing this or b) there were any objections to the > patches themselves: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-57 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-45 > > If I don't hear anything back, I'm going to go ahead and commit them. > > The only possible issue I see is with WSS-45 as it changes the > AbstractCrypto(Properties properties) constructor to AbstractCrypto(Map). > Since Properties extends Map this shouldn't be an issue unless someone is > using reflection. But would anyone really be using reflection with an > AbstractCrypto constructor? I don't think so... > > Cheers, > - Dan > > -- > Dan Diephouse > Envoi Solutions > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
-- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
