Hi,
(Not sure if this is best in the newsgroup or here, but just kick me if
its better for the newsgroup)
I'm in the grey zone at the moment since I have to figure out when I want
to move
my plugin code from WTP 0.7 to WTP 1.0.
As it stands I can see that the StructuredXMLEditor's api have been made
more public and that is good.
The question is - is that API considered stable at the moment ? Mainly if
the extension points name
and semantics are in place ? (api changes are easy to catch by the
compiler, but the xml in plugin.xml does
not complain if the extension point doesnt exist so damn hard to track
down ;)
Another thing is the quality of the code completion in XML (see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=89811)
which basically makes it very hard to create a valid xml file when writing
the code by hand; and that does not
need to be the case but as far as I can see in the WTP code I can't easily
customize the code completion rules
for XML yet. e.g. I need to order the inserts by relevance (or even remove
non-valid xml).
My question is if work have been done in this area with respect to WTP 1.0
so I can actually get a real benefit
from upgrading to WTP 1.0 ? (I don't need all the functionallity, just the
possibility to order the proposals
by validity and add required attributes/tag automatically to the inserted
text - and hopefully without using
internal API)
thanks
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hibernate.org
JBoss Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
