That's bad...I were convinced that wtp had decided to solve this post 0.7,
but
apparently I misunderstood 'this is the last version' - I thought that
meant M9,
but I understand now that you meant 1.0 (even in the mail discussions we
have versioning problems :(
And I already reported this to WTP:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=99338
/max
Sorry Max ... we will be addressing the infamous "PRETTY BAD practice of
NOT VERSIONING Eclipse" post 1.0
as we join the Callisto train. And while there are "base" bugs and
proposals for this, feel free to open a WTP specific
bug on the 'releng' component to ensure it gets assigned, gets priority,
and gets "fixed" in a way you would find acceptable.
We have not, technically, decided exactly how we will address (if exactly
like base Eclipse, or some variant of it).
Reference:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=99393
and the resulting proposal,
http://eclipse.org/equinox/documents/plugin-versioning.html
"Max Rydahl Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/27/2005 10:15 AM
Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc
Subject
[wtp-dev] M9 version numbering disappointment ;(
Hi,
Started looking at migrating hibernatetools to WTP 1.0M9 from 0.7 and see
to my disappointment
that the version numbers of all plugins already is marked as version
1.0.0
even though they clearly
aren't ;(
Meaning we will have the same problems with updatesites as we had with
0.7
upgraders.
When 1.0 comes out you will not be able to see the difference between a
M9
plugin and a 1.0 plugin...
I thought this were actually being planned as something that should not
happen again...
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hibernate.org
JBoss Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
