Tim,

So you are still advocation the fix for 120109 which just involves changing a URL, correct?

What other defered bug are you refering to? Do you have a safe, tested, fix for it?

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Timothy Deboer/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

12/12/2005 10:56 AM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."

To
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <[email protected]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: [wtp-dev] Hot Bug Status - RC4 Decision






Hi Arthur,


Please see my post to the mailing list on Saturday night. 120109 is blocking the dynamic install of the Geronimo server adapter and we only need to change a URL to fix it. There is also another defect in the note that was deferred to 1.0.1 but I think we need to reconsider.


Thanks,

Tim deBoer
WebSphere Tools - IBM Canada Ltd.
(905) 413-3503  (tieline 969)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Arthur Ryman/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

12/12/2005 10:19 AM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."

To
[email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
[wtp-dev] Hot Bug Status - RC4 Decision








I received some additional Hot Bugs requests. Here are the ones that have not been formally defered yet:
119939 maj P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW jst.serv --- Error when publishing Dynamic web app to Websphere 6
120109 blo P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASSI jst.serv 1.0 M10 Unable to download Geronimo server
120280 cri P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW jst.j2ee 1.0 M10 "Could not publish to the server" on wtp 1.0rc2
120267 cri P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW wst.sse 1.0 M10 NPE when calling DocumentCSS#getOverrideStyle()





For 119939, I haven't heard back from Sinan yet. Naci - can you please followup on this? Thx. I'll investigate the impact of defering this to 1.0.1.


For 120109, the fix is really just a temporary workaround for a demo. I believe Sachin can live with a patch, so we should probably defer this to 1.0.1.


For 120280, Tim deBoer provided a patch. I am waiting to hear back from Tim and/or Chuck on this with a fix/defer recommendation.


For 120267,  I believe we can defer this to 1.0.1. I am waiting for a fix/defer recommendation from David.



Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

Reply via email to