Sounds like a case of source compatibility, but not binary compatibility.
You should be able to leave in the old method, as deprecated, that would just delegate to the more specific one.
That would then maintain binary compatibility too.
| Jason A Sholl/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/15/2006 03:20 PM
|
|
I did change this back in March, but am not sure why this is broken. The change was to return an IDataModelPausibleOperation instead of IDataModelOperation, however, IDataModelPausibleOperation extends IDataModelOperation.. Why would that cause breakage?
Thank you,
Jason A. Sholl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
919-543-0011 (t/l 441-0011)
| Arthur Ryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/15/2006 03:07 PM
|
|
Did someone delete a method from this interface? This was reported at Geronimo. I opened a bug to track it [1]
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=141850
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
