Abel, I have just realized ... unless I am mistaken ... that you may be assuming or planning that our WTP 3.0 (designed for Eclipse 3.4) will also work with Eclilpse 3.3. Is that right? Or, do you just want your code to work with both. I hope it's the latter, since our 3.0 code will _not_ work with Eclipse 3.3.
I am probably misunderstanding, but thought I should clear that up, if it is not clear. Also, this mailing list is primarily for developers developing WTP, for some of these items, seems like you could open bugzillas, and/or ask on newsgroups. As you can see, most developers don't mind too much and we try to be helpful ... just thought that would be another thing I try to make clearer. Thanks, From: Abel Muiño Vizcaino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <[email protected]> Date: 05/05/2008 05:10 PM Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] WTP integration in the IAM project proposal Thanks Konstantin, I tried that approach on wtp 2.x (latest version from WTP or Europa update sites) and the adapter manager is returning null. So I used this instead: Object configObject = def.createConfigObject( javaFacetVersion, mavenProject.getProject().getName() ); if ( configObject instanceof IDataModel ) { // This works in WTP 2.0 return (IDataModel) configObject; } else { // This is the compatibility layer for WTP 3.0 return (IDataModel) Platform.getAdapterManager().loadAdapter( configObject, IDataModel.class.getName() ); } Which works fine for WTP 2.x, but I'm not sure if this is the intended pattern. Is there any online resource where I can learn a bit more about this API and its evolution? -- Abel Muiño Vizcaino - http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com El 05/05/2008, a las 18:42, Konstantin Komissarchik escribió: Abel, You should use Platform's adapter manager to "cast" the config object to IDataModel rather than casting it directly... Object config = def.createConfigObject( javaFacetVersion, mavenProject.getProject().getName() ); IDataModel model = (IDataModel) Platform.getAdapterManager().loadAdapter( config, IDataModel.class ); When this code evolved for 3.0, backwards compatibility layer was added to help existing users, but the backwards compatibility layer is bypassed by casting directly rather than adapting. Let me know if you have further questions on this. - Konstantin -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Abel Muiño Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 12:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] WTP integration in the IAM project proposal After the solution of https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=228452 , our users report a new problem: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.eclipse.jst.common.project.facet.core.JavaFacetInstallConfig cannot be cast to org.eclipse.wst.common.frameworks.datamodel.IDataModel This is caused by: IProjectFacet javaFacet = ProjectFacetsManager.getProjectFacet( "jst.java" ); IProjectFacetVersion javaFacetVersion = javaFacet.getVersion( "5.0" ); Build buildModel = mavenProject.getModel().getBuild(); for ( IActionDefinition def : javaFacetVersion.getActionDefinitions( Action.Type.INSTALL ) ) { IDataModel model = (IDataModel) def.createConfigObject( javaFacetVersion, mavenProject.getProject().getName() ); // ^^ The above line causes the exception ^^ model.setStringProperty( "IJavaFacetInstallDataModelProperties.SOURCE_FOLDER_NAME", makeRelative( mavenProject, buildModel.getSourceDirectory() ) ); model.setStringProperty( "IJavaFacetInstallDataModelProperties.DEFAULT_OUTPUT_FOLDER_NAME", makeRelative( mavenProject, buildModel.getOutputDirectory() ) ); facetActions.add( new Action( Action.Type.INSTALL, javaFacetVersion, null ) ); } Is this an API change? If it is not, what's the right form of adding the java (or any other) nature using the 3.0 API? (We also need to programatically add any other nature, so if there's an online reference, that would be great). Abel Muiño wrote: Carl Anderson-4 wrote: Can you please open a Bugzilla for this problem, marking it as appropiate (it appears that you want this treated as a blocking problem), and we will get this resolved as soon as possible. Although I replied privately (I don't know why I'm not receiving mail from the list), just wanted to copy here the link to the bug report: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=228452 ----- http://www.linkedin.com/in/amuino Abel Muiño Vizcaino - http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WTP-integration-in-the-IAM-project-proposal-tp16785078p17037577.html Sent from the Eclipse WTP - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
