Very good point. From that standpoint the language itself is controlled by a corporation (Adobe) but, from what I know, the language itself is open source. From the stance of "vendor neutrality" it probably would not be a good fit.
For information sake, there are three major companies that make ColdFusion engines: Adobe, New Atlantis, and Railo Technologies. Recently (within the last year) New Atlantis has spawned an open source version of their engine, Blue Dragon, which has become a separate entity. In the next month or two Railo Technologies is joining JBoss making two ColdFusion engines that are/will be available. But yes, the more I look at the WTP project itself I can see that it wouldn't fit with the rest of the selection. I'll look into other alternatives. Thanks for your time. -- Randy Merrill On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:59 PM, David M Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > CFML does not sound like not a good fit for Eclipse, from what I know of > it. From what I know, it is not a "standard" and even if that could be > overcome, as far as I know there are only a few servers that support it, so > would be starting to violate the "vendor neutrality" principle of Eclipse. > Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong or have old information. > > >
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
