Was just thinking about adding webtools.java-ee-config to Juno. Marked as
such in the portal

 

- Konstantin

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [wtp-dev] Who, in WTP, will be in Juno?

 

The Eclipse Foundation recently added 'juno' to their list of
'simultaneousrelease' flags in their metadata for projects. I wanted to test
if some of the summary pages were working, so needed some data, so I signed
up "webtools" to be in Juno. No controversy there ... I hope! 

By looking at 

http://eclipse.org/juno/planning/SimultaneousReleaseOverview.php

you can see that the "tracking" relationships from last year were
maintained. We in WTP have always released (for the yearly train) as one big
project, and only track as one big project, one set of docuware, IP logs,
etc. As far as I know, that's still desired and easiest. So the "summary"
shows all our sub-projects "under" webtools. 

But, still Project Leads, those "child" sub-projects
(webtools.sourceediting, webtools.webservices, etc.) should still go in and
mark your own project's "simultaneousrelease" flag to denote a "1" for
"juno" just for completeness. (In case there's other software that looks at
individual project flags). Whether or not you are "tracked" under the parent
webtools is handled by the "tracking data" part of the portal and should
need no change for those in last year's (Indigo) release. 

Now, for the subject question ... who _else_ will in in Juno? 

Are there any new or incubating projects that are planning to be in Juno? 

Such as Java EE Module Configuration Editors (webtools.java-ee-config)? If
the plan is to release with Juno, Konstantin, you should mark the
"simultaneousrelease" flag for juno (to be "1"), and then go in to "tracker"
part of portal, and set "track with parent" (Assuming that's the plan). 

What about Pave? That project hasn't seemed too active, but, I think they
should either "release" or consider "archiving" themselves if there are no
plans to do a release. So, if the plan is to release, then please mark
flags. Feel free to discuss with the PMC is questions/issues. 

What about XQDT? That's a collection of components in WTP Incubator. If they
want to release, they will first have to move out to a separate sub-project,
etc, so in some sense they'd have the most work to do .... but, last I
heard, the tools in there were pretty useful ... but I'll confess I've lost
track of their plans, progress, and process. 

Any others? 

Note: remember that incubating projects can still release, if you you'd like
to release as still an incubating project. You can still go in the common
repository if you are incubating, but, as a matter of policy, the EPP JEE
Package only accepts "graduated" components. 

Note 2: I would not worry too much about filling in or checking all the
other "tracking data", yet, such as the fields for URLs, etc., as those
forms need some fixes and improvements anyway and its unclear exactly what
or when that will happen. The important thing for now is to "declare intent"
by M4 (December). 

Let us know if any questions. 

_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

Reply via email to