(Resending using the correct email address) On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Mike Milinkovich < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 24/04/2013 7:56 AM, John Peberdy wrote: > >> >> Earlier this month I made this fork of JSDT available. While working on >> this my goal was to have it eventually merged back in. This is the reason >> it is currently using the same plugin names. I would be very happy if it >> did get merged in. I would like to gauge your interested in merging it. >> > > John, > > I hate to be the heavy, but I am duty-bound to point out that the Eclipse > Foundation considers its namespace as a trademark[1]. Fundamentally, we > want the org.eclipse package names to denote code that actually comes from > Eclipse projects. Your continued use of the org.eclipse package names is in > violation of our trademark policy. > > It would be wonderful if your fork can be merged back into the JSDT > mainline code development. However, if that is not possible, we would > kindly ask that you modify your package names as soon as possible. > Thanks for the feedback, trademark violation was not intentional. I will change the name before the end of the week. If that is not soon enough, let me know! I had not made the change sooner because I was hoping that Eclipse would desire progress in JSDT. > > [1] > http://www.eclipse.org/legal/**logo_guidelines.php<http://www.eclipse.org/legal/logo_guidelines.php> > > Best regards, > > Mike Milinkovich > Executive Director, > Eclipse Foundation > ______________________________**_________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev > > -- > John Peberdy <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev>
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
