So, just so we're clear, should we expect the WTP team to work on a TomEE server adapter (provided via the discovery mechanism) or will you guys wait for an external contribution?
I personally can't imagine a TomEE server adapter living outside the WTP codebase, since it's pretty much a tomcat 7++. And I'm pretty sure at least the Tomcat runtime detection algorithm will need to know about it, to avoid detecting it as tomcat 7. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mike Milinkovich < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the clarification. > > > > Mike Milinkovich > > [email protected] > > +1.613.220.3223 > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Elson Yuen > *Sent:* November-07-13 9:25 AM > > *To:* General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues. > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support > > > > Let me clarify that I am not suggesting to move the tomcat server out of > the WTP project. All I am saying is we'd like to expose the new server > adapters via the discovery mechanism. > > Regards, > Elson > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Elson Yuen, P.Eng. > RAD and WebSphere Server Tools Architect > IBM Toronto Lab > Tel: (905) 413-2689, T/L: 313-2689 > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Tim deBoer---11/07/2013 08:43:21 > AM---This has been WTP's policy for several years, and nobody is sug]Tim > deBoer---11/07/2013 08:43:21 AM---This has been WTP's policy for several > years, and nobody is suggesting otherwise. I assume this was > > From: Tim deBoer/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA > To: "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." < > [email protected]>, > Date: 11/07/2013 08:43 AM > Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support > Sent by: [email protected] > ------------------------------ > > > > > This has been WTP's policy for several years, and nobody is suggesting > otherwise. I assume this was just paranoia around Elson's choice of words. > > Tim > > [image: Inactive hide details for Mike Milinkovich ---05/11/2013 06:03:34 > PM---A big +1 to that, with a particular tip of the hat to th]Mike > Milinkovich ---05/11/2013 06:03:34 PM---A big +1 to that, with a particular > tip of the hat to the notion of supporting popular open source s > > From: > > > Mike Milinkovich <[email protected]> > > To: > > > [email protected], "'General discussion of project-wide or > architectural issues.'" <[email protected]>, > > Date: > > > 05/11/2013 06:03 PM > > Subject: > > > Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support > > Sent by: > > > [email protected] > ------------------------------ > > > > > > A big +1 to that, with a particular tip of the hat to the notion of > supporting popular open source servers like Tomcat out of the box. Last > time I checked, Tomcat was an Apache project, not "vendor specific". > > *From: *Konstantin Komissarchik > *Sent: *Tuesday, November 5, 2013 5:55 PM > * To: *'General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.' > *Reply To: *General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues. > *Subject: *Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support > > > While decoupling of WTP from individual server adapters is great, we > should not be pushing server adapter maintainers away from Eclipse > Foundation, if that’s where the maintainers would like to develop and host > a particular adapter. This is especially true for adapters with long > history of active development at Eclipse Foundation, like the Tomcat > adapter. The key goals is decoupling of adapter schedules from WTP schedule > and providing uniform access to adapters via adapter discovery, but none of > those goals actually require moving adapter development somewhere else. > Tomcat adapter could be split off as a separate project under server tools > (provides release schedule independence) and published on eclipse.org for > adapter discovery. > > - Konstantin > > > *From:* [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Elson Yuen > * Sent:* Tuesday, November 05, 2013 2:32 PM > *To:* General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues. > *Cc:* [email protected] > * Subject:* Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support > > > In general, our direction is to move away to from shipping individual > server adapters directly within WTP. We are pushing for all vendor > specific server adapters to provide externally via the "Download additional > server adapters" link. Therefore, if you happens to be creating a new > server adapter for TomEE, it should be exposed via the downloadable server > adapter. See the plugin org.eclipse.wst.server.discovery for providing > additional server adapter. > > Regards, > Elson > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Elson Yuen, P.Eng. > RAD and WebSphere Server Tools Architect > IBM Toronto Lab > Tel: (905) 413-2689, T/L: 313-2689 > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Larry Isaacs ---11/05/2013 04:06:55 > PM---Hi Fred, With respect to Tomcat-8 support, it is on my to-do]Larry > Isaacs ---11/05/2013 04:06:55 PM---Hi Fred, With respect to Tomcat-8 > support, it is on my to-do list including creating a BZ entry. Th > > From: Larry Isaacs <[email protected]> > To: "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." < > [email protected]>, > Date: 11/05/2013 04:06 PM > Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support > Sent by: [email protected] > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Hi Fred, > > With respect to Tomcat-8 support, it is on my to-do list including > creating a BZ entry. The problem is I’m back to struggling to finding > enough cycles to get something finished and committed. I have done some > initial work that needs a little clean up before it is ready to commit. > The big unknown is the “Serve Modules without Publishing” feature, as they > have made major changes to how resources are handled in Tomcat 8. That > will likely have to come later. It’s unclear whether I will get the > initial work committed for 3.6.0M3. I have some extra vacation scheduled > around Thanksgiving, so I should be able to get it into 3.6.0M4 if not in > M3. > > Cheers, > Larry > > *From:* [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Fred Bricon > * Sent:* Tuesday, November 05, 2013 1:40 PM > *To:* General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues. > *Subject:* [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support > > Hi, > > I vaguely remember reading something, somewhere, about a Tomcat 8 support > work-in-progress. I couldn't find any related BZ ticket though. What's the > status on that matter? > > There's one request[1] to add TomEE to the list of supported servers. Do > you have any plans on adding that to Luna? > > Thanks, > > Fred > > {1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387733 > > > -- > "Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev > > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev > > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev > > -- "Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd
<<image002.png>>
<<image003.png>>
<<image001.gif>>
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
