Eugene, it's perhaps a stupid question, but closure compiler is too a tolerant parser?
2016-04-07 19:38 GMT+02:00 Gorkem Ercan <[email protected]>: > > > On 7 Apr 2016, at 12:44, Eugene Melekhov wrote: > > I would not hold my breath on that. Even if we can get the IP work done. >>> We still need a converter from Closure’s IR >>> to DOM AST so that the current functionality continues to work. >>> >> >> Yes, unfortunately it's not that easy. I'd prefer to use Closure's IR >> directly in order to avoid conversion at all and >> manipulate it directly if necessary, but this require work. I've found at >> least 341 file importing ASTNode in >> org.eclipse.wst.jsdt.ui so you see... >> >> Perhaps it's possible to use class derived from Closure's Node as wrapper >> or implement some Adaptor in Eclipse's >> terminology to minimize conversion, but it depends. It's hard to say in >> advance. >> >> > Possible but I think it is a good idea to keep parser model and DOM model > separate so that we still have options. > > Also conversion from a strongly typed model to another one may actually be > faster than converting from nashorn/esprima. > > > >> -- >> Eugene Melekhov >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wtp-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev >
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
