Thanks Mickael for your answer. > So before you get started with it, make sure that the effort is worth it.
No time to do that, it was just an idea and I wanted to know your opinion. > About BlueSky, if we want XML in BlueSky, it seems infinitely simpler to just embed WTP-XML than to create a language server on top of WTP-XML. I would like to consume XML TextMate grammar, I'm afraid that it's not possible with WTP XML Editor. 2018-03-14 14:30 GMT+01:00 Mickael Istria <[email protected]>: > I think it's a good idea. > That said, it's a big piece of work to make a LS on top of WTP. Moreoever, > this LS would be pretty huge (we're talking about probably a hundred MB to > bring WTP XML as a LS), so it may not easily fit in VSCode Marketplace. > JDT-LS had to workaround it with a relatively complex system that downloads > the RCP part at first startup, otherwise the VSCode marketplace wouldn't > allow the extension. > So before you get started with it, make sure that the effort is worth it. > It's up to you to figure out how much you're ready to invest in this LS to > ship it for VSCode. > About BlueSky, if we want XML in BlueSky, it seems infinitely simpler to > just embed WTP-XML than to create a language server on top of WTP-XML. > > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev >
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
