Proposal on New direction after speaking with Bret. I think that the rdoc for the watir project should include all 3 gems, watir, firewatir and commonwatir This is the rdoc we should display at wtr.rubyforge.org/rdoc
Then for each individual gem the rdoc created locally by each user will reflect only that particular gem library. marekj Watirloo: Semantic Page Objects in UseCases http://github.com/marekj/watirloo/ Support Watir Project http://pledgie.com/campaigns/2982 On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:09 AM, marekj <[email protected]> wrote: > I asked Tom to remove the files (done, thanks to Tom: > http://rubyforge.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=92511) > next: make nice index.html suggested by Zeljko instead of just raw dir listing > > > marekj > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Željko Filipin > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:07 AM, marekj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> anybody has any ideas how I can remove the old files? >> >> You can ask Tom Copeland (http://tomcopeland.blogs.com/) of Rubyforge. Let >> me know if you need his e-mail. Rubyforge has a support tracker too, the >> were pretty quick to reply when I had problems. Let me know if you can not >> find it. >> >>> posted new docs >>> http://wtr.rubyforge.org/rdoc/1.6.5/ >> >> Thanks! Looks great. :) >> >> Željko >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wtr-development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development >> > _______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
