I had few comments about current README: 1) There is only FireWatir examples. I know that the only difference is between require "watir" and "firewatir", but since there isn't anything about jssh, then the examples won't work out of the box. Maybe change that to use watir instead? Of course other argument for using firewatir is it's cross-compatibility option :)
2) Maybe use hashrocket in locating elements instead of "old" comma-style? So b.text_field(:name, "entry.0.single").set "Watir" would become b.text_field(:name => "entry.0.single").set "Watir" This allows us to say that de facto standard is hashrocket. Otherwise, nice job Željko! Jarmo On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Željko Filipin <zeljko.fili...@wa-research.ch> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Alister Scott <alister.sc...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I am happy to do this and will work on it over the next two days. > > Alister said he would update README in a couple of days, but it is already 5 > days since then, and I have some free time... :) > > http://github.com/bret/watir/pull/7 > > Please let me know what you think. > > Alister, feel free to further improve README (if it gets merged intro > bret/watir). Also, let me know if you have any git/github > questions/problems. > > Željko > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > Wtr-development@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > _______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list Wtr-development@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
