There are some minor inconsistencies between rdoc and yard, but i don't see any problems with that currently.
Maybe someone takes a look at that generated documentation and compares it to rdoc to see what's the biggest differences. Jarmo On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Željko Filipin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Jarmo <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have a proposition - ditch these rdocs from the above location and >> point documentation links to rubydoc.info instead. > > +1 > > I will make the change, probably today. > > If somebody disagrees, now is the time to say something. > > Željko > -- > watir.com - community manager > watirpodcast.com - host > testingpodcast.com - audio podcasts on software testing. all of them > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > _______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
