I think we mentioned at watirday that we should communicate spec
capabilities for the different browsers and APIs in the watir domain.

Is this something we can automate from watirspec? i.e. output a table and
reference on Watir.com:

API                 IE6     IE7    IE8     IE9      FF3      FF4    etc
watir                100%  98%  98%   80%     n/a
firewatir
safariwatir
watir-webdriver
etc

Maybe also indicate the different versions/channels of APIs available  e.g.
stable, dev, beta

Logical questions from newbies are:
1. what version of watir should I use?
2. is it stable, used in production (yes I know FB uses it but they are on
an old version for example)
3. where is the doco for the version I use

We communicate that it's cross platform, multi browser but that's only true
in certain combinations with ruby version X, api choice Y and api version Z

Thoughts?


On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Jari Bakken <jari.bak...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Ekin Han <nbkhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am using watir-webdriver now.
> >
> > Could anybody tell me where is the online doc of waitr webdriver?
> >
>
> API docs: http://rubydoc.info/github/jarib/watir-webdriver/master/frames
> Wiki: https://github.com/jarib/watir-webdriver/wiki/_pages
>
> > And is watir-webdriver stable enough for real world testing?
> >
>
> Yes. I know several big companies who use the underlying WebDriver
> technology very successfully in production, and has been doing so for
> years. However it depends on what browsers you need to test. I'm using
> the Firefox driver for real world testing and it's *very* stable. The
> Chrome driver which is in the current release is not great, but a
> rewrite has just landed in Selenium trunk and by the next release of
> selenium-webdriver (which watir-webdriver builds on top of) we will
> have excellent Chrome support as well. The IE driver has traditionally
> been the least stable driver, but it has seen huge improvements over
> the past few months (thanks to fantastic work by Jim Evans) and its
> pass rate on watirspec is now looking very good as well. I haven't
> used it for any real world testing, so can't really speak to its
> stability outside the specs.
>
> Jari
>
> --
> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search
> before you ask, be nice.
>
> watir-gene...@googlegroups.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>



-- 
Cheers,
Tim

@90kts
_______________________________________________
Wtr-development mailing list
Wtr-development@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development

Reply via email to