All pull requests, which didn't have any problems, got already pulled in yesterday. All watir tests are passing for me under xp ie8. Firewatir tests are having some failures, but it could be related with my vm. So it's thumbs up from me - go with the rc :)
Don't forget to git pull before doing that and creating a correct git tag (using similar name as previous tags). J. On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Hugh McGowan <colinsda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've checked in the changes for IE9. The unit tests are passing for me on > IE8 and IE9 on Win7. I'll check WinXP/IE8 in the next few days. The > highlights are: > * send a parameter in with ole_object.click because otherwise > buttons/links would not actually get clicked in IE9 Document Standards Mode > (Quirks mode worked but if the webpage changes the DOCTYPE it would fail). > There's a new unit test for this case > * use dispatchEvent instead of ole_object.fireEvent (if the browser > version is IE9). IE9 is more compliant with the accepted standards so works > a lot like firewatir...which is in fact, where I stole the code from :) > * support should be there for everything except modal_dialogs which I'll > try to fix in a future release. I think it's going to take some hacking in > the win32ole code, so it doesn't appear to be a trivial change. > > If someone else could take a look at what I did for IE9, that would be > great. We've been using this internally at Convio and so far so good, but > extra eyes are always appreciated. > > Jarmo wanted to add some fixes in from pull requests. Once he gives the > thumbs-up, I'll spin a RC gem. > > Thanks to Jarmo for wading through my changes and giving feedback! > > Thanks! > Hugh > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > Wtr-development@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > _______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list Wtr-development@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
