Too bad i got late to answering. Why did you guys decide on the name "watir-classic"? It seems to me being a little off-putting name as to "this is something classic, which means it should be old and probably deprecated, i'll just use something else". Why didn't you decide on the name "watir-ie" as it was before?
What's the plan to let users know about this change via "gem install"? My proposal would be to release watir version X.X which would raise an error if "require 'watir'" is done or something similar. Any other proposals? I'm not actually happy about these last minute changes because these will postpone the release even more. It's already been 5 months since the last release. It's really-really bad in my opinion. I mean, REALLY BAD. In the mean time i've tried to make all specs pass with IE9, but caught up with my PC crashing. Trying to restore my OS, but that will not happen before few weeks due to my upcoming vacation. What is watir-compatibility? A lot questions :) Jarmo On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Hugh McGowan <colinsda...@gmail.com>wrote: > The first part is done: https://github.com/watir/watir-classic > > I'll be putting together the new Watir repository in the next week.... > > Thanks! > Hugh > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > Wtr-development@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development >
_______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list Wtr-development@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
