On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jarmo <jarm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On the other hand i'm on the verge of releasing my own page-object gem, which i have been using in my own projects. Its main goals are really simple API (really easy learning curve) and supporting of all possible frameworks - watir-webdriver, watir-classic, selenium, capybara, whatever. And the total codebase is ~100 lines. That might sound that it has a lot of less functionality and maybe you're right, but i tend to like systems which are easier to understand. > I'm not trying to say that this means everyone should prefer one to another and that complex systems are definitely less good, but i'm trying to say that instead of declaring something as a de facto standard we should rather give users a choice between multiple ones.
I am open to adding more than one page object gem to watir project. If that happens we should pick a default. I think the time is come for watir project to become more that just browser driver and offer the users a complete test automation solution. After all, watir stands for "web app testing in ruby", not for "browser driver". Željko
_______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list Wtr-development@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
