the latest version of ruby installs 'fox12'
I think the installer was written for 'fox'

I cnat be certain as I dont have any code available right now. We would need to 
fix this for the next release though

Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 12:38 pm
Subject: Re: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...

> Ok, I just ran the installer ( versions .15 & .14 ) and after I've
> gotten Ruby installed, when I run the watir installer ( install.rb )
> it says it can't find Fox
> 
> Any ideas? I'm running XP.
> 
> j.
> 
> 
> On 8/3/05, Jeff Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... will the new dialog functionality replace the AutoIT stuff 
> as well ?
> > 
> > On 8/3/05, Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Another complication of this is that some frame properties are not
> > > accessible from the frame itself, but rather from its 
> container. This is
> > > because, internally, there is a Frame element and a Window 
> element referred
> > > to by the frame and contained in the Frames array. To see what 
> i mean, look
> > > at what i recently had to do to allow Frames to be accessed by 
> id instead
> > > of name -- kinda hairy.
> > >
> > > The design principle with Watir is that we try to make Watir 
> be intuitive,
> > > even if that means our code isn't a simple mapping to the OLE 
> objects.> >
> > 
> > I fully agree with that, if all I wanted was access to the COM 
> stuff,> I could do that without WATiR.
> > 
> > > Ultimately, i think we need to start taking a more 
> experimental approach.
> > > We need to be able to release an implementation and discuss it 
> and modify
> > > it, *before* we commit to supporting it.
> > 
> > So, where/how is the repository ( SCM ) run now?
> > 
> > I mean, if this is an experimentation thing, we need to get 
> setup to
> > go and pull source to try the experimental version, and leave the
> > "release" version for the people that don't want to play with new
> > features that will most likely change before release.
> > 
> > > Right now i am working on new dialog support code. I think 
> everyone will
> > > like both the new API and the new functionality that will come 
> with it. If
> > > so, we then face what to do with the old WinClicker and 
> WindowHandler code,
> > > which i would like to deprecate.
> > 
> > So, does this new functionality replace the AutoIT stuff or does it
> > wrap it ... or what ???
> > 
> > > Bret
> > >
> > > At 10:27 AM 8/3/2005, Paul Rogers wrote:
> > > >ah, good point. Should it perhaps only iterate the top level 
> frames?> > >
> > > >and if you wanted lower level frames, you would apply an 
> iterator to that
> > > >frame. Seems like this way would save me work;-) But probably 
> be less
> > > >intuiitive.
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 2:35 am
> > > >Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
> > > >
> > > > > At 10:33 PM 8/2/2005, Paul Rogers wrote:
> > > > > >I want to add a frame iterator object as soon as I get 
> the chance:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Ie.frames.each {|f|  ....  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >When that's, there, it would be simple for you to add 
> your 'click
> > > > > a link
> > > > > >in any frame' method. It wont be this release though.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Paul
> > > > >
> > > > > This will be harder than the other iterators because frame
> > > > > collections can
> > > > > be nested. If you only search document.frames[], you won't
> > > > > actually
> > > > > traverse all of the frames.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _____________________
> > > > >  Bret Pettichord
> > > > >  www.pettichord.com
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wtr-general mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Wtr-general mailing list
> > > >[email protected]
> > > >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
> > >
> > > _____________________
> > >   Bret Pettichord
> > >   www.pettichord.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wtr-general mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
> > >
> > 
> > I'm MORE than happy to help with coding as well. I'm not 
> familiar with
> > how things normally work with RubyForge projects ( or at the general
> > open source level either ) ... I've mostly worked in closed source
> > environments...
> > 
> > But, I'd be GLAD to help make the current Best-In-Class solution the
> > Best Solution Possible.
> > 
> > j.
> > 
> > --
> > "So long, and thanks for all the fish"
> > 
> > Jeff Wood
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> "So long, and thanks for all the fish"
> 
> Jeff Wood
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wtr-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
> 

_______________________________________________
Wtr-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general

Reply via email to