On 11/2/05, Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd appreciate any suggestions. We often get pleas for example code, so it > would seem nasty to omit stuff like this just because it didn't have tests. > Yet it obviously is misleading/surprising to include untested and possibly > half-baked stuff like this in our library. > > Suggestions?
Perhaps just have all that stuff called things like "contrib-cookiemanager".. then note them in a nice list in the docs / on the website, with a page per-item. Separate them somewhat from the main documentation. Maybe also have it all downloadable as a separate addon/gem? _______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
