But some people who are conservative might prefer using the new method definition i provided below as it would require changing fewer files.
Bret
On 7/11/06, Mike Townley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So should I use this instead of the original code for this method?
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris McMahon
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 5:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] assert_arrayEquals
On 7/11/06, Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone else runs into this problem you can simply do
>
> def assert_arrayEquals a1, a2
> assert_equal a1, a2
> end
>
> and now your tests will work.
That's what Dave and I were kind of discussing. I think the original
assert would pass if you compared [1,2,3] and [3,2,1], and would also
give you an error msg. if the arrays had different number of elements.
_______________________________________________
Wtr-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
_______________________________________________
Wtr-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
_______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
