I thank Jim, Richard, Paul and Charley for their posts on this topic.

The issue of popularity was first raised in the context of an
observation that from the look of our project page at Rubyforge, the
project looked dead. I've just made several changes to this page that
i think will help curious parties realize that Watir is an active
project and the current software and information are at
OpenQA. http://rubyforge.org/projects/wtr/

I would appreciate detailed suggestions if you believe that more
should be done at this location. I am also collecting suggestions for
improvement of the main website (http://wtr.rubyforge.org). Please add
your suggestions here: http://jira.openqa.org/browse/WTR-97

Do we want Watir to be more popular is a real question and an
important question. Watir is a volunteer project. There are no
companies funding it. I spend my own time on it as do all the other
volunteers. Why are we doing this? As a volunteer organization, it is
important to be clear on the goals of the volunteers and the
organization, if you can call it that.

I have, at different times, both wanted to make Watir more popular and
regret the popularity that it has had. Right now i'm leaning more on
the regret side and Charley has heard me kvetch lately about that and
his post reflects some of our conversations. There are a number of
substansive things to be done, and i'll deal with them in more detail
in later posts, but first i want to stay right on this issue of
popularity.

The question, to me, isn't a matter of popular vs. elitist, but rather
of whether Watir needs more popularity right now. And if so, whether i
should be spending my project time on this, or encouraging other
contributors to do so. To me, to make Watir more popular, you mostly
make it easier for people to learn about and use and then also get the
word out with articles and talks and blog posts.

In the releases leading up to Watir 1.4, Jonathan Kohl really took the
lead in popularizing Watir. He created the website at
wtr.rubyforge.org, commissioned a logo, wrote the users guide, and
worked with Paul Rogers on the API documentation (rdoc) and the Watir
Works article for Better Software.

But Jonathan and Paul aren't really involved in Watir 1.5, and no one
has really taken over the responsibilities that Jonathan
shouldered. Charley Baker has been helping lately with some of the
kinds of things that Jonathan did. He's been helping me managing the
bug list and has been fixing bugs.

One big job that we didn't have back with 1.4 is answering the
questions on this list. The popularity of Watir has really caused the
traffic on the list to blossom/explode. I'd like to make a special
thanks to Zeljko (that's pronounced zhel-ko, in case you didn't know)
for the help has given on the list. As i feared, opening up the
gateway to the OpenQA web forum has really increased the traffic
here.

I say "fear" because i have a very hard time seeing people struggle
with Watir. Personally, i would much rather have Watir be less
popular, but have the people who are using it be more successful. And
mostly i feel like the way i can do this best is not to improve the
documentation for Watir, but just make Watir easier to use and less
buggy.

Watir is not my first experience with popularity. For a while i had
the website that Google ranked number one for "software testing." That
was interesting, but with time, it became more and more of a chore and
generated boring emails. So i stopped updating it and today it is
ranked only number five, which still isn't bad for a website that is
five years out of date.

I also co-authored a popular book. That's been a better experience,
particularly since i actually get money because of its popularity.

So far Watir hasn't generated any direct income for me, other than a
paypal donation that i got out of the blue last week (thank you, CR).

What i get, in the end, is interesting conversation, or not. And, of
course, a decent tool to use in my day-to-day work.

Bret
_______________________________________________
Wtr-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general

Reply via email to