Nathan wrote: > We would like a good way to test in Firefox and Safari that isn't > proprietary, and free if possible.
For Safari, the first thing I would try is AppleScript. There's a decent chance that Safari is already scriptable using AppleScript, and any other language that has a bridge to the same interfaces that AppleScript uses. > I disagree that automating something "always has the potential to perturb the > results" as you put it. We can reduce our exposure to that potential by being careful about our approach. So there are a good number of automation projects that do succeed, when people are smart about using the tools. -Danny _______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
