On 1/22/07, Jason He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, it seems that test unit encapsulate some methods could handle error
You can also handle errors in ruby without test unit. Take a look at Exceptions, Catch, and Throw section of Programming Ruby ( http://www.rubycentral.com/book/tut_exceptions.html). as well as include some statistics for the test result.
You can also make your own statistics. What is the suggestion if I want to write about 200~300 standalone test
cases, which will run in a sequence, should I use test unit or without it?
Without test unit. But, it is only what I think. If you really like test unit, Bret made a patch for it so methods are run in order you define them, but I did not try it. Take a look. http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Test-Unit+Patch -- Zeljko Filipin zeljkofilipin.com
_______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
