looking at the methods provided, it would seem that some are definite candidates for inclusion the dialog code for example )
some of the others, like the regex methods, dont seem to be particularly suited watir. But saying that, thanks for the contributions, they are always welcome, and give people ideas of what can be done Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bret Pettichord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <wtr-general@rubyforge.org> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 4:45 PM Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Our contribution to Watir > Charley Baker wrote: >> It's great to have user contributions, I haven't had a chance to look >> at it yet, but will soon. Instead of adding it to a jira ticket, you >> should add it to the user contribution area of the wiki on openqa. >> http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Contributions > I've been talking the people at Webmetrics off-list. They would like > their enhancements to be bundled in the watir gem. I explained that we > would need unit tests and need to review the enhancements for > consistency with the Watir design principles. Submissions via Jira are > appropriate for this kind of thing. For changes, we prefer a patch file, > but since this submission amounts to a monkey patch, it's current form > is acceptable. > > Just for the record, we don't have these constraints (tests, > consistency) for code that submitted to the contributions page of the > wiki. > > Bret > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > _______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
