------------------------- Via Workers World News Service Reprinted from the June 15, 2000 issue of Workers World newspaper ------------------------- FROM ASIA TO EUROPE: U.S. "MISSILE SHIELD" PLAN ALARMS WORLD By Fred Goldstein President Bill Clinton's latest tour of Western Europe, Russia and the Ukraine has ended in a fiasco. He was there as a sales rep for the Pentagon and the military-industrial complex to peddle the so-called "missile shield." But no one was buying. Not that he was actually going to sell the system to Europe or Russia. On the contrary. The U.S. wants the exclusive right to deploy a complex, high-tech, anti- missile system that would increase Washington's military dominance over both its European imperialist rivals and the Russian counterrevolutionary bourgeoisie--while raising a significant threat to the People's Republic of China. Such is the arrogance of U.S. imperialism that it is trying to strong-arm its adversaries into giving "permission" for its military domination over the world. At issue is the deployment of a misnamed National Missile Defense (NMD) system. This system would be composed of ground-based, advanced radar stations, satellite-based sensors and a battery of anywhere from 100 to 250 missile interceptors. The interceptors would be placed in Alaska and the radar stations would be dispersed all over, from Greenland to Asia. According to the Congressional Office of the Budget, the system would cost $60 billion by the time it is scheduled to be deployed-the first 25 interceptors in the year 2005 and up to 100 by the year 2007. This is not counting cost overruns. NOT `DEFENSE' BUT FIRST STRIKE This system is deliberately misnamed as a "defense" system to conceal its aggressive nature. A functional anti-missile system is fundamentally a first-strike weapon. It frees up the U.S. to make an attack on a country, nuclear or conventional, and without fear of retaliation. The Pentagon, the State Department and the White House have tried to sell the system based on creating a hysteria against so-called "rogue states," principally the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and also Iraq and Iran. They base much of this hysteria on the fact that the DPRK launched a missile over Japan in 1998 to send up a satellite. "Rogue state" is an inflammatory label invented by the U.S. government that really applies to themselves. If there is any "rogue state," a state that sets itself apart by its unmitigated viciousness and isolationist disregard for the rest of the 180-plus states in the world, it is the U.S. government. This is the government that unleashed on the world the horror of nuclear arms. It is the only government in the world that ever used nuclear weapons. And it is the one government that makes nuclear terror the fundamental basis of its military strategy. Most recently, it is drenched in the blood of the Yugoslav and Iraqi people. Its crimes are too numerous to list. It is truly a "rogue state" that has pitted itself against the entire world. In fact, the NMD system is an extreme danger to the DPRK. The idea that the DPRK would launch an unprovoked attack on the U.S. is too ludicrous to even contemplate. But it takes little imagination to envision the U.S. and its puppets in south Korea, with 37,000 U.S. troops on the ground and close to 1,000 nuclear weapons in the area, provoking a military conflict to overthrow the socialist government in Pyongyang. The NMD system is designed precisely to eliminate any potential nuclear deterrent, either by the DPRK or the People's Republic of China, to such an act of aggression by U.S. imperialism. The same military reasoning applies to Iraq or Iran, both of which have been attacked by the U.S. In fact, an anti-missile system has long been regarded as such a dangerous military development that such systems were strictly forbidden by the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile agreement between the U.S. and the USSR. But with the destruction of the USSR, and the advent of the decadent, counter-revolutionary regime in Russia, which has bankrupted the country and allowed its military establishment to deteriorate, the relationship of military force has changed drastically in favor of Washington. And now the Pentagon is pushing to tear up this form of restraint upon its aggressive designs. EUROPEAN RIVALS OPPOSED TO NMD Such dangerous developments have caused consternation among the European imperialist "allies." According to the New York Times of June 2, "German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder warned President Clinton . that Europeans fear that plans for a U.S. missile defense system could set off a new arms race and provoke fresh instability in Russia." During a 90-minute meeting, originally supposed to last only 20 minutes, "the two leaders verbally dueled over the dangers and protections they foresee if the U.S. launches its reinvention of the 1980s `Star Wars,' " continued the Times article. " `We have to be very careful that any such project does not re-trigger the process of a renewed arms race,' Schroeder told journalists after the talks." Schroeder was expressing the dismay of the European ruling class with this new attempt by Washington to exert absolute world dominance. The European imperialists were recently humiliated by the exercise of U.S. military domination in NATO's war of aggression against Yugoslavia. They are just now trying to develop their own 60,000-troop rapid deployment force and the military capability behind it to exert some semblance of military independence from the Pentagon. Now they are confronted with the hopeless choice of falling further behind Washington or engaging in an expensive new technological arms race which the U.S. is bound to win. CLINTON IN MOSCOW Things did not go any better for Clinton in Moscow. The Putin regime was adamant. "The Cold War may be over," wrote the Dow Jones Newswire on June 5, "but there was a distinct chill in the summer air in Moscow Sunday when U.S. President Bill Clinton wound up a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin with no major agreements, no use of first names and no smiles." Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbot said that "President Putin made it absolutely clear to President Clinton that Russia continues to oppose changes in the ABM treaty that the United States has proposed since last September." He added, according to Dow Jones, that "Russia believes that NMD will undermine strategic stability, threaten Russia's strategic deterrent, and provoke a new arms race." Clinton tried to sell the missile interceptor system to Putin on the grounds that it could only shoot down a small number of missiles and therefore could "only" be directed against states with small numbers of missiles, such as the DPRK or China. But Putin did not buy the argument that Washington would limit itself. Nor do the Russian capitalists necessarily look forward to the U.S. establishing further dominance in Asia. Whether Putin was putting on a public display of hostility for the sake of political appearances to distance himself from Yeltsin's consistently humiliating policy of capitulation to the White House, the Pentagon and the IMF, only time will tell. Both sides tried to paper over the impasse with side agreements on the destruction of plutonium stockpiles and a joint early-warning monitoring system. But for the moment, Clinton hit a stone wall. CHINA WARNS OF GLOBAL ARMS RACE What has received less publicity, but which is in the short run the most important consequence of the deployment, is its affect on the PRC. Early last month China's chief arms negotiator, Sha Zukang, had an interview with the New York Times declaring the missile shield to be "an unacceptable threat to China's security." (New York Times, May 11) The NMD "would leave China dangerously vulnerable to bullying or attack, said Mr. Sha, the Foreign Ministry's director general for arms control. If that appears likely, `We won't sit on our hands.' The American proposal, he said, would spark a new global arms race and possibly what he called a `nightmare scenario' of weapons proliferation." The Times article pointed out that "Since the 1960s [China] has avoided trying to match American and Soviet arsenals, instead keeping a small number of missiles as a minimal deterrent, able to retaliate in the event of an attack. " `To defeat your defenses we'll have to spend a lot of money, and we don't want to do this,' Mr. Sha said, adding that China's greater priority is economic development. `But otherwise, the United States will feel it can attack anyone at any time, and that isn't tolerable,' " reported the Times. Despite all the maneuvering and diplomatic dancing between Wall Street and the government of the PRC over trade, the fundamental hostility of U.S. imperialism towards the socialist government of China is expressed in this escalating military pressure. And it was exerted at the very moment that Congress was voting for Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China. `FULL COURT PRESS' AGAINST CHINA The PRC is no doubt aware of the Pentagon's Asia strategy, alluded to in an article in the Washington Post of May 26. "When Pentagon officials first sat down last year to update the core planning document of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, they listed China as a potential future adversary, a momentous change from the Cold War," wrote the Post. "When the final version of the document, titled `Joint Vision 2020,' is released next week," continued the Post, "it will be far more discreet. Rather than explicitly pointing at China, it simply will warn of the possible rise of an unidentified `peer competitor.' " In fact, the new push for a missile system directed at China and the DPRK is a strategy directly taken from the Cold War. In addition to the military threat, it is an attempt to undermine socialist construction by diverting vast financial and intellectual resources to military spending. It was Reagan's $2-trillion "full court press" of military spending that did a great deal to undermine the morale of the USSR and bring to the fore the most reactionary elements, headed by Mikhail Gorbachev, who wanted to make a complete accommodation with imperialism. This helped set the stage to go from accommodation to counter-revolution. The NMD is a full military, economic and political strategy of the most aggressive character. This U.S. offensive against Asia, Russia, Europe and the rest of the world must be opposed by the masses of workers and oppressed people at home. The consequences of the Pentagon's quest for world domination are intensified hardship at home. The tens of billions in new military appropriations will not come out of the vaults of the rich but from the pockets of the masses of people. This will be expressed in less spending on education, housing, medical care, childcare and all social services. It will result in another huge transfer of wealth from the working class to the military-industrial complex. Some $60 billion has already been spent on research since Reagan first announced the plan, called the Strategic Defense Initiative at that time. Now the major players--Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon and TRW Inc., together with Northrup Grumman and thousands of subcontractors across the country--are waiting to gather in the contracts. HESITATIONS IN THE RULING CLASS There are hesitations in the ruling class over whether this system can really work. There are other hesitations over whether it is better to spend the money on other, more immediately desired means of aggression. There is vacillation in the ruling class over whether the whole endeavor is worth the risk of political destabilization. Clinton has said he will make a decision by November, but there is strong pressure in some sections of the ruling class to hold off on the decision for the moment. Such a momentous step inevitably produces conflict among the bosses. But the long-term prospect for stopping the development of this new phase of militarism on a truly progressive basis lies in the mass movement. All movement activists and organizations of the workers and the oppressed, from the unions to the community, need to get together in an anti- militarist front and say no to the Pentagon. - END - (Copyleft Workers World Service. Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org) ------------------ This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>