-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the July 20, 2000
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------
WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO SLOW AIDS TOLL IN AFRICA?
By Pam Parker
On the eve of the 13th International AIDS Conference in
Durban, South Africa, a June 27 report by the United
Nations World Health Organization revealed the appalling
extent of the HIV/AIDS crisis in Africa.
Some 34.3 million people are infected with the HIV virus
in sub-Saharan Africa.
Some 71 percent of the world's HIV-infected population
lives in South Africa, Botswana, Swaziland, Zimbabwe,
Lesotho, Zambia, Namibia, Malawi and Kenya.
It's estimated that only 2 percent of those people have
access to life-extending drug therapies, or even to drugs
that treat the secondary diseases that accompany AIDS.
In South Africa 3.6 million people, or 8.6 percent of the
population, are infected.
The UN estimates that 50 percent of all girls in Kenya now
15 years old will be infected in their lifetimes.
In Botswana two thirds of all today's 15 year olds will
eventually die of AIDS. This means that in 20 years there
could be more people in their 60s and 70s than in their 40s
and 50s in that country.
Such a huge death rate usually happens only during a major
war, and then affects mostly the adult male population.
Last year AIDS surpassed all other causes of death in
Africa.
AIDS SPREADING WHERE POVERTY IS GREATEST
AIDS has taken its toll in many Latin American and Asian
countries as well. The Caribbean nations have been hit
hardest. In some areas of Haiti 13 percent of pregnant
women are infected with the virus. The exception is
socialist Cuba, where the rate of infection is just .03
percent.
The African National Congress was confronted with the
gloomy forecast of the AIDS epidemic at roughly the same
time it was taking power from the apartheid regime. The ANC
recognized that this could be a huge health crisis.
An ANC health officer stated that "we could see AIDS all
around us in the countries where we were in exile and we
were already seeing some HIV-positive comrades."
In 1990, shortly after Nelson Mandela was released from
prison, the ANC convened a conference in Mozambique. Chris
Hani, who headed the ANC's guerrilla force, Umkhonto we
Sizwe, said the South African people "cannot afford to
allow the AIDS epidemic to ruin the realization of our
dreams."
The ANC leadership saw the need for aggressive control of
the epidemic. But they were burdened with an inadequate
health care apparatus inherited from the apartheid regime.
As part of an agreement with the apartheid National Party,
the ANC had agreed to keep on civil servants who had been
in office before the democratic revolution. During their
tenure, however, a government AIDS program had been
virtually nonexistent.
This decision left the new government with "people who
could care less if Black people died from AIDS," according
to the director of the AIDS program in Pretoria.
"I don't know how you get a national AIDS program to work
when you've inherited a civil service that you don't trust,
and who doesn't trust you" says Glenda Gray, a senior
researcher at Chris Hani Hospital in Soweto.
In the countryside, where most Africans live, some people
didn't get word of the disease until 20 years into the
epidemic. Superstition, the oppression of women and the
introduction of Christianity--which has added a layer of
shame to the discussion of sex--have exacerbated the spread of
the disease.
WHAT IT WILL TAKE
What will it take to slow the spread of AIDS in Africa?
Hundreds of millions of dollars for youth-focused
education, aggressive treatment of other sexually-
transmitted diseases, wide distribution of condoms, low-
cost or free life-extending drugs, low-cost or free drugs
that minimize the risk for the spread of the disease from
mother to baby, and intensive counseling--just to start.
These measures are proven to work in the fight against
AIDS. Many countries have prevented an epidemic or slowed
the disease's progression by these means. The African
nations of Senegal and Uganda are among them.
So why do the wealthy capitalist countries have such
blatant indifference to the spread of AIDS in Africa? They
knew the scourge was coming for many years. They also knew
there was a means to control it.
In 1990 the CIA released an Interagency Intelligence
Memorandum (IIM 91-10005) on the growth of AIDS in Africa.
The study went to the White House and every cabinet-level
agency.
According to its author, Kenneth Brown, the document was
met with "indifference." He waited several months for the
flurry of briefings that generally accompany the release of
major intelligence documents, but Brown's study was met
with silence.
Brown went on to say that "many in the intelligence
community felt that the continent was overpopulated
anyway."
During this same period the World Health Organization
projected a death toll of tens of millions of people in
Africa by the year 2000--but did nothing.
Imperialism with its weapons of racism and sexism was
undoubtedly a factor in the decision of the West to turn
its back on Africa.
By early 1990 U.S. officials felt that AIDS would "not be
a major heterosexual epidemic in the United States," said
Michael Mann of the WHO.
"AIDS is no longer a threat to the West," Mann said. He
concluded, "the bottom line is that the epidemic could rage
on in Africa, and we could control it here. Do we really
need Africa?" Washington Post, July 5.
According to William Foege, a former official of the
Centers for Disease Control: "You must tie the needs of the
poor to the fears of the rich. When the rich lose their
fear, they are no longer willing to invest in the needs of
the poor."
An internal study by the World Bank's Population and Human
Resources Department tries to find some good in all this,
stating, "If the only effect of the AIDS epidemic was to
reduce the population growth rate, it would increase the
growth rate of per capita income in any plausible economic
model."
The report cites the bubonic plague epidemic in the 14th
century as an example of this.
White South African economist Alan Whiteside called it the
"silver lining to the plague."
Duff Gillespie, who oversaw AIDS assistance as director of
the U.S. Agency for International Development program on
population health and nutrition, argued that
"overpopulation, not AIDS, was the most important problem
in Africa"--even though Africa has a lower population
density than Europe or Asia.
Gillespie went on to say that it would be "wrong to
suppose that such decisions were based on gross ignorance
or morally bankrupt." He said the lack of resources made
available to combat the spread of HIV was "simply the
product of a different world view and set of priorities."
(Washington Post, July 5)
Despite their blatant disregard for the devastating
effects of AIDS in Africa, however, the Clinton
administration, the IMF and other Western institutions have
been forced to offer some relief thanks to the tremendous
pressure placed on them by the militant AIDS movement here
and abroad.
MIMINAL U.S. AID
But the relief has been minimal. The U.S. has increased
its world AIDS budget to $450 million--about one third of
the military aid package Congress just passed for Colombia.
A few of the big pharmaceutical companies have lowered the
price of drugs to these developing nations--but they are
still far out of reach for most people.
An IMF program that is supposed to afford relief to what
are called Highly Indebted Poor Countries has been
ineffective. The UN began a modest program targeting
teenagers. It would have provided information and condoms
to young people. But these efforts were thwarted by those
who believed they would have jeopardized the organization's
relationship with the Vatican, which opposes birth control.
If the industrialized nations were serious about ending
the spread of AIDS, they could cancel Africa's debt to the
banks and the IMF. It's been estimated that it would take
$2.5 billion to stop the growth of AIDS in Africa. Africa
owes roughly $100 billion, and pays $10 billion per year in
interest.
Isn't the real debt the one owed by the rich capitalist
countries that plundered Africa of its people and its raw
materials for centuries? Shouldn't the means to end this
deadly scourge come from the class of wealthy parasites in
the U.S. and Europe who have put a chain of debt around the
necks of the African people?
- END -
(Copyleft Workers World Service. Everyone is permitted to
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
