-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Feb. 7, 2002
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

ENRON & MONOPOLY CAPITALISM: WHAT WALL ST. KEPT 
FROM THE WORKERS

By Fred Goldstein

As the World Economic Forum convenes in New York and bankers 
from the U.S. have to circulate among the financiers and 
capitalists of the world, they will suffer a certain 
discomfort.

After all, the powers behind Enron--J.P. Morgan Chase, 
Citicorp, Bank of America, brokerage houses like Merrill 
Lynch, investment banks like Morgan Stanley, and other 
titans of U.S. capitalism--will have to slide delicately 
past the subject of the tidal wave of corruption that has 
surfaced and engulfed their entire political establishment, 
both parties, as well as the White House and the Securities 
Exchange Commission.

These bankers are the financial powers behind the engines of 
globalization. They have preached the free market, financial 
transparency, monetary discipline, the rule of law, and 
every other pious and hypocritical phrase they could think 
of to mask their brutal takeover of economies all over the 
world. They have caused untold mass poverty and suffering, 
cultural genocide and the destruction of the environment.

Now, because of the Enron collapse and all its fallout, they 
have been caught with their hands in the till--investing in 
phony partnerships, financing tax cheats, shredding 
documents and callously gambling with the life savings of 
thousands of workers. High-paid corporate executives lied 
for profit, their accountants swore to it and their lawyers 
declared it all legal.

This cast of characters is not new on the stage of history. 
Only the names have changed.

In 1916, V.I. Lenin, the leader of the Bolshevik Revolution, 
wrote a ground-breaking book entitled "Imperialism, the 
Highest Stage of Capitalism." In it he showed that 
imperialism was not a policy but a form of society. The 
early, competitive stage of capitalism inexorably developed 
into monopoly capitalism. This happened in all the major 
capitalist countries of that time. Each one was dominated by 
a financial oligarchy that exerted control over all economic 
life at home and was feverishly engaged in the export of 
capital abroad--where it could carry out the super-
exploitation of hundreds of millions of colonial people.

The book was written in the midst of World War I, the first 
great imperialist war. It described the motive force of the 
war: to re-divide the globe, which had already been divided 
up among all the imperialist powers.

Even a cursory look at the Enron scandal confirms Lenin's 
writings on imperialism.

A GLOBAL INDUSTRIALIST AND FINANCIER

Enron had 25,000 miles of natural gas pipeline in the United 
States, 8,000 more miles in South America, water treatment 
plants in Britain, power plants in Italy, Poland, Turkey, 
Guatemala, Nicaragua, Puerto Rico and the Philippines, a 65-
percent stake in a major Indian power plant--and that's just 
for starters.

Enron tried to rise above being just an industrial 
corporation to become a broker and a trader. Thus it was 
both industrial and financial. It has been supported and 
controlled in this endeavor by the biggest banks in the U.S.

It recruited Brig. Gen. Thomas White to be the head of Enron 
Energy Services, then a decade later sent him into the 
present Bush administration as Secretary of the Army. It 
dictated its energy policy to now-Vice President Dick 
Cheney, a militarist who was Secretary of Defense during the 
first Bush administration. It had dozens of Pentagon 
contracts.

Enron is the epitome of an aspiring, new-on-the-scene 
imperialist corporation. Its demise has shown to the whole 
world how a corporation, backed by the banks and tied to the 
military machine of U.S. imperialism, can control the 
regulatory process and use its financial power to direct the 
policy of the capitalist state.

On the domestic front, the sudden collapse of a corporation 
the size of Enron, which claimed $100 billion in revenue in 
the year 2000 and had $66 billion in stock outstanding at 
its peak, raises numerous questions and issues for both the 
ruling class and the working class. But the real issues are 
buried beneath a mountain of hypocrisy and deceit.

The ruling class pundits are trying to frame the issue as 
corrupt corporate practices versus playing by the rules. 
They point to Enron's use of partnerships to hide its 
losses. They seem to be truly indignant that Arthur 
Andersen, one of the holy Big Five accounting firms, 
actually signed off on these schemes as within accounting 
guidelines. They excoriate the prestigious Houston law firm 
of Vinson & Elkins for dubbing the whole thing as legal.

Now everyone is suitably outraged.

But the real issue is not one of playing by the rules. The 
real issue is that even though they broke the rules, they 
lost the game. They cost the rich billions of dollars, 
discredited the stock market and the 401(k) Wall Street 
pension scheme and, in the process, aroused the ire of the 
masses, who saw 15,000 workers lose $1.3 billion of their 
life savings while the executives walked away with more than 
$1 billion in stock sales.

THEY ALL KNEW

The truth is that every one on Wall Street knew that Enron 
was not playing by the rules. As early as 1999 the German 
energy giant Veba was contemplating a merger with Enron. 
But, according to the New York Times of Jan. 27, Veba backed 
away from the deal after the firm "became concerned about 
the levels of debt Enron had and with what a senior 
executive said were Enron's 'aggressive accounting 
practices.' Consultants from PricewaterhouseCoopers told 
Veba that Enron, through complex accounting and deal making, 
had swept tens of millions in debt off its books, making the 
company's balance sheet look stronger than it really was."

The second of the Big Five accounting firms, 
PricewaterhouseCoopers was only "one of several banks and 
consulting firms that worked on the Veba-Enron deal. Other 
advisers included Goldman, Sachs, Credit Suisse First Boston 
and McKinsey & Company, brokers and consultants said."

"In the wake of Enron's collapse," added the Times, "it has 
become apparent that many financial firms-from Enron's 
lenders to Wall Street bankers who underwrote the company's 
partnership, to investment houses that bought into them, to 
the accountants who reviewed their books-knew more about 
Enron's condition than the company publicly disclosed."

In fact, when Veba backed out, it had concluded that the 
company's total debt load amounted to 70 to 75 percent of 
its value. In short, it was a debt-inflated bubble waiting 
to burst.

"Enron executives enticed wealthy individuals and 
institutions to invest in one of the partnerships that 
helped wreck the company by dangling the prospect that 
inside knowledge could potentially help them double their 
money in a matter of months," reported the Times on Jan. 25. 
The records show Enron executives offered "Wall Street firms 
and wealthy investors inside knowledge about Enron and its 
off-the-books holdings-information they denied company 
shareholders."

Some of the biggest corporations in the world were involved, 
including Citicorp, Travelers Insurance, Morgan Stanley and 
American Home Assurance. "Three or four of the largest 
investments in LJM2 [one of the partnerships--F.G.] brought 
in returns of more than 100 percent. The lowest return from 
an investment in another Enron entity called Raptor I was 58 
percent over four months; the highest, in Raptor II, was 212 
percent in just over three months. In the first quarter of 
last year the partnership distributed about $75 million to 
investors," continued the Times.

While perhaps not all the intimate details of the Enron 
scams were clear, the general picture was known all over 
Wall Street long ago.

If Goldman, Sachs, Credit Suisse First Boston, 
PricewaterhouseCoopers and other giant Wall Street firms 
knew, then Robert Rubin, Clinton's Secretary of the Treasury 
and former head of Goldman, Sachs, knew.

The Securities and Exchange Commission members must have 
known.

The Public Oversight Board that is supposed to oversee the 
accounting profession must have known.

Mutual fund managers, brokerage houses, stock analysts, all 
knew that the Veba merger had fallen through because of 
phony accounting.

The word must have gotten to the heads of the Senate and 
House banking committees, who hob-knob with bankers.

It is highly probable that word of all this wafted its way 
up to the Olympian heights from which Alan Greenspan, head 
of the Federal Reserve Board, periodically descends to utter 
his ambiguous, carefully hedged truisms about the capitalist 
economy.

NOW THAT THE HORSE IS GONE ...

Now everyone is screaming about regulation, oversight, 
standards, etc. But no one rushed to demand regulation of 
"aggressive accounting" and questionable partnerships BEFORE 
Enron crashed-when the parasitic bankers, brokers and other 
coupon-clipping parasites were making 212 percent on their 
investments in three months.

No one wanted to blow the whistle when Enron stock was 
rising and all the investors' portfolios were increasing in 
value, making them rich on paper.

But now they are all crying foul, lining up to get their 
money back from the bankruptcy proceedings--Citigroup, J.P. 
Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and others that either 
participated in the schemes or kept quiet. Lawsuits are 
flying back and forth.

This is a classic demonstration of the anarchy of capitalism 
carried into the financial sphere. The bankers and bosses 
want some minimal regulation to keep from getting fleeced by 
each other and to keep the system from going haywire and 
collapsing. But no specific capitalist grouping of investors 
wants to enforce any particular regulation at any given 
moment if it stands in the way of their making a super-
profit--come what may. They will ruin sections of their own 
class and, of course, trample all over the working class in 
pursuit of super-profits.

Karl Marx once wrote that for a really high profit, a 
capitalist would commit murder, but for one even higher, he 
would risk death. V.I. Lenin, the leader of the first 
socialist revolution in 1917 in Russia, agreed with that, 
saying that for a profit, the capitalist would sell the rope 
used to hang him.

These two great leaders of the working class understood the 
ruling class and what profound contradictions are inherent 
in capitalism. But they did not stop at analysis. They 
organized and mobilized the workers to fight back so as to 
eventually liberate themselves from capitalism altogether.

Today the working class has to learn the lessons of the 
Enron scandal. It has to separate its problems from those of 
the bankers and financiers.

CAPITALIST ACCOUNTING DOESN'T PREVENT FRAUD

The issue for both classes is one of accounting and control. 
The capitalist class has minimal central control over the 
conduct of the giant monopolies, the banking houses, the 
industrialists. The monitoring of the ruling class has been 
largely allocated to the accounting profession. The 
capitalist state has little or no responsibility except 
after the fact, when a violation is uncovered. On a day-to-
day basis, it is up to the accountants.

But the accounting profession is part of the ruling-class 
establishment. They are a profit-gouging group of 
exploiters, just like the capitalists they are supposed to 
monitor. Thus, at the end of the day, the capitalist class 
has no reliable way of preventing wholesale fraud, because 
they are all engaged in it. It is part of capitalism.

For the Enron workers, who had their life savings tied up in 
company stock, and for the millions of other workers whose 
pension funds also held millions in Enron stock, there was 
no one in this entire affair to stick up for them during all 
these backroom dealings.

This is what the working class must concern itself with.

There was an unholy capitalist alliance between Enron, its 
accountants, its lawyers, the commercial bankers, the 
brokers, the investment bankers, congressional oversight 
committees and the regulators--all either trying to make a 
killing or covering up for Enron. It's a microcosm of what 
exists generally throughout capitalism. No one raised one 
word about the workers and their life savings. All this took 
place for years behind the backs of the working class, in a 
conspiracy of the rich to protect themselves.

Now 10 congressional committees, the SEC, the Justice 
Department and others are trying to get into the act, 
talking about reform and oversight. But the lesson of the 
Enron scandal is that the workers have to have an 
independent position and defend their own class interests.

VANISHED MONEY BELONGED TO THE WORKERS

The first thing to declare is that all this money belonged 
to the workers. All the money in those 401(k) plans was 
wages that had been deferred. This was compensation for 
labor performed. If the managers made it disappear because 
of fraud, then all that labor, in the millions of dollars, 
was performed for nothing.

The capitalist government, which was supposed to protect the 
workers against this fraud, and the investors who got rich 
from it--including not only Enron executives but the 
Citigroup investors, the Travellers Insurance investors, the 
Morgan Stanley investors and any other parasites who 
invested in schemes that ultimately devalued the workers' 
holdings--should make good on every single penny.

The workers should be first on line as the primary creditors 
in the bankruptcy proceeding, of course. But they should not 
wait in agony during a prolonged judicial process to get 
relief. The Bush administration--or should we say the Enron 
administration--should immediately set aside funds, not only 
for the Enron workers, but for all the pension plans that 
held Enron's watered stock. It could start by diverting 
money from the huge $48 billion increase Bush is proposing 
for the Pentagon and its aggression around the world.

The labor movement should get behind a massive counterattack 
to protect all the workers who have been cajoled and 
swindled out of their pensions, which have wound up in the 
hands of Wall Street speculators. The workers should fight 
back against being tied to stock options and demand 
guaranteed, fixed pensions instead of having their wages 
turned over to a gang of financial gamblers. The government 
should be putting extra money into Social Security, not 
figuring out ways to rob it and gamble with it.

The working class should find ways to intervene in the 
Washington struggle over reform and oversight to protect its 
interests and not get involved in fixing things for the 
capitalists.

But in addition to opening up an immediate struggle, a 
longer-term evaluation of this collapse and the revelations 
surrounding it must be made.

WORKERS' CONTROL AND ACCOUNTING

The accounting for the production and distribution of the 
trillions of dollars of wealth created by the working class 
cannot be left to the capitalists and their accountants. 
Those who created it, the working class, should be the 
overseers. This scandal shows that the bosses have no 
responsibility whatever to the workers or society in 
general.

What is obvious from this scandal is that the working class 
needs to get control of society by setting up its own state. 
Only then will the fraud and deception inherent in the 
capitalist profit system be eradicated.

In fact, in the early days of the Bolshevik revolution Lenin 
argued that after the seizure of power by the workers and 
the peasants, the beginning steps toward socialism would 
involve the workers taking over accounting and control of 
production and distribution. In early 1918, in "How to 
Organize Competition?" Lenin wrote: "Accounting and control-
this is the main economic task of every Soviet of Workers, 
Soldiers and Peasants' Deputies, of every consumers' 
society, of every union or committee of supplies, of every 
factory committee or organ of workers' control in general. 
..."

"[W]idespread, general, universal accounting and control, 
the accounting and control of the amount of labor performed 
and the distribution of products-is the essence of socialist 
transformation, once the political rule of the proletariat 
has been established and secured.

"Only the voluntary and conscientious cooperation of the 
mass of the workers and peasants in accounting and 
controlling the rich, the rogues, the idlers ... can conquer 
these survivals of the accursed capitalist society."

As regards legislative oversight, Marx and Lenin had much to 
say on this question that is highly relevant to the working 
class today. Both of these leaders took their inspiration on 
this question from the Paris Commune of 1871, the first 
successful seizure of power by the working class.

In his famous work "State and Revolution," written in 1917, 
Lenin quoted Marx's analysis of the Commune in "The Civil 
War in France." Wrote Marx, "The Commune was formed of the 
municipal councilors, chosen by universal suffrage in the 
various wards of the town, responsible and revocable at 
short terms. The majority of its members were naturally 
workers or acknowledged representatives of the working 
class. ... From the members of the Commune on downwards, the 
public service had to be done at workers' wages. The vested 
interests ... of the high dignitaries of the state 
disappeared along with the high dignitaries themselves."

In other words, if you claim to represent the workers and 
the people, you are responsible for what happens to them and 
you share their economic condition.

All the office holders in all the congressional 
subcommittees are high paid and live like the bosses they 
are supposed to be regulating. They take bribes called 
"donations" from Enron and all the Fortune 500. But suddenly 
they are going to rush into the breach to "correct" the 
situation.

>From the point of view of the working class, they are all 
guilty of collusion and negligence. The time to protect the 
people is before they suffer an attack. They were all 
sitting on their hands collecting their fat paychecks while 
the Enron corruption was going on under their noses.

The only way to put an end to economic swindling, 
oppression, racism, sexual oppression and imperialist war is 
to organize a mass movement to take the economy and the 
state out of the hands of the Fortune 500, the bankers and 
financiers.

Lenin talked about the need for workers' control and 
accounting "once the political rule of the proletariat has 
been established and is secured." There is no way to do this 
other than to build a party whose objective is to establish 
the rule of the workers and the oppressed.

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to 
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but 
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact 
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)





------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to