-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Aug. 29, 2002
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

WORLD OPPOSITION TO U.S. THREATS ON IRAQ: RAMSEY 
CLARK LETTER GALVANIZES ANTI-WAR SENTIMENT

By Greg Butterfield

A letter from former U.S. Attorney General and International 
Action Center founder Ramsey Clark to the members of the 
United Nations Security Council has been reprinted, e-mailed 
and posted on Web sites worldwide. The letter is helping to 
galvanize opponents of a new U.S. war against Iraq to take 
action, according to the IAC.

The July 29 letter has been translated into at least nine 
languages and is being used as an organizing tool by anti-
war forces in many countries. It has also elicited an 
outpouring of heartfelt e-mails from individuals and groups 
thanking Clark for his strong stand and the IAC for its 
leadership in the global anti-war movement.

Echoing the themes of his letter on the Pacifica Radio 
program "Flashpoints" Aug. 15, Clark told journalist Robert 
Knight: "I don't know of a time in history where a 
government has so taunted a people with destruction ... The 
U.S. is telling Iraqis, 'We're going to bomb the hell out of 
you and install our Shah.' We have to mobilize."

Workers World spoke with the IAC's John Catalinotto, who 
coordinated the effort to have Clark's letter translated and 
distributed internationally. "We asked people about two 
weeks ago to translate Ramsey Clark's letter into as many 
languages as possible. The response was much stronger than 
we expected," he reported.

"Right now we have the letter in nine languages that we know 
of--Arabic, Danish, Dutch, French, German, Italian, 
Portuguese, Russian and Spanish--and it's currently being 
translated into Chinese," Catalinotto said.

"On the one hand it is a sign of the respect that people in 
the anti-war movement around the world have for Clark. But 
it was also an even stronger sign that the international 
working-class and anti-imperialist movement is extremely 
concerned about the threats against Iraq and is mobilizing 
to fight against the war," he concluded.

The complete text of the letter is available on the Web at 
www.iacenter.org in several languages. It has also been 
posted on Web sites from Canada to New Zealand.

The IAC is part of ANSWER--the Act Now to Stop War and End 
Racism coalition. ANSWER has called for a day of 
internationally coordinated demonstrations Oct. 26 to launch 
a massive mobilization in opposition to a new war against 
Iraq.

ANSWER is urging local organizers to hold picket lines, 
rallies, vigils, teach-ins and more in their areas. Log onto 
www.internationalanswer.org for more information.

A CALL TO ACTION

Although Clark's letter is addressed to the UN Security 
Council, with copies sent to the UN General Assembly and 
Senator Joseph Biden of the Senate Committee on Foreign 
Relations, its real intended audience is the broad global 
opposition to a new U.S. war against the Iraqi people. It's 
a call to action for the people of the world to stand up to 
Washington and stop the war before it starts.

"Threats to attack, invade and overthrow the government of 
Iraq by President George Bush, Vice President Cheney, 
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, various cabinet officers and 
Pentagon officials have been routine for a year. The 
psychological warfare is itself a crime against peace and 
violates the UN Charter," Clark wrote.

Clark warned that the U.S.-dominated Security Council has 
stretched the UN's credibility to the limit. "If the UN is 
unable to restrain the U.S., a permanent member of the 
Security Council, from committing crimes against peace and 
humanity as well as war crimes against a nation that has 
already been violated by the U.S. beyond endurance, then 
what is the UN worth?

"At the very least, opposition to any attack or attempt to 
overthrow the government of Iraq by force must be publicly 
expressed by the UN."

Clark reminded the Security Council that "The U.S. led and 
glorified the massive assault on Iraq in January and 
February 1991. The Pentagon announced it conducted 110,000 
aerial sorties against the defenseless 'cradle of 
civilization,' dropping 88,500 tons of bombs. The widespread 
bombing destroyed the economic viability of civilian society 
throughout the nation. It killed tens of thousands of Iraqi 
citizens and others. A major part of the bombing was 
directed at civilians and civilian facilities. ...

"The U.S. crafted economic sanctions against Iraq which the 
Security Council approved on Aug. 6, 1990... Those sanctions 
are the direct cause of the very cruel deaths of more than a 
million people.

"The sanctions continue to this time to cause hundreds of 
deaths each day. Every UN agency dealing with food, health 
and children--including FAO, WFP, WHO, UNICEF--has 
proclaimed the horror, magnitude and responsibility for this 
human catastrophe," Clark charged.

U.S. IS BIGGEST THREAT TO PEACE

Refuting Bush's claim that Iraq is developing weapons of 
mass destruction, Clark noted, "Two of the highest UN 
officials responsible for weapons inspection within Iraq and 
a principle U.S. citizen participating in the inspections 
have resigned, denounced the sanctions and denied that there 
is a threat that Iraq will develop weapons of mass 
destruction."

The real danger comes from Washington, Clark said.

"The U.S. has more nuclear weapons than all other nations 
combined as well as the most sophisticated and numerous 
systems for the delivery of nuclear weapons... It possesses 
the greatest stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons 
and the most advanced and extensive research in mass 
destruction weaponry in the world. Military spending by the 
U.S. exceeds that of the nine next largest budgets for war 
combined. President Bush has repeatedly declared the right 
to strike first.

"The U.S. has renounced treaties controlling nuclear weapons 
and their proliferation; voted against the protocol enabling 
enforcement of the Biological Weapons Conventions; and 
rejected the treaty banning land mines, the International 
Criminal Court and virtually every other international 
effort to control and limit war. The U.S. War Against 
Terrorism is a declaration of right by the U.S. to attack 
first--anyone, anywhere, on mere suspicion, or without 
excuse, unilaterally.

"If, as promised so many times, the U.S. does attack Iraq to 
overthrow its government, it will be the most notorious, 
arrogant and contemptuous violation of the Charter of the 
United Nations, the Nuremberg Charter and international law 
yet experienced, or likely hereafter," Clark wrote.

"An attack on Iraq by the U.S. would also violate the 
Constitution and laws of the U.S. and expose President Bush 
to impeachment by the House of Representatives under the 
Constitution for the highest of crimes, those against peace 
and humanity, to judgment by the Senate and trial in federal 
court for crimes charged," he added.

'THANK YOU FOR SPEAKING THE TRUTH'

The IAC has released some of the dozens of responses 
prompted by Clark's letter. Many people who wrote wanted to 
know how they could get involved in anti-war organizing, 
while groups said they want to work more closely with the 
IAC and ANSWER to mobilize resistance.

Some reported that they had sent copies of Clark's letter to 
local legislators or parliament members. Some, like Lawyers 
Against the War in Iceland, want to send their own letters 
to the UN supporting Clark's.

Others are from people outraged by the complete lockdown on 
alternative views by the mainstream, corporate media. One 
correspondent, Sally, wrote simply, "Thank you for speaking 
the truth." Margery from New Orleans said, "I believe you 
speak for thousands of us who feel the same anguish and 
outrage you feel about the out-of-control U.S. war machine 
and its current target, Iraq."

"As an Arab woman and as a human being, I am so grateful 
that you exist," wrote Dunia. And Ala said, "I am an Iraqi 
living in Northern Ireland ... I love my country. I will do 
whatever I can to stop the USA from bombing Iraq."

"Many here in Canada look on in disbelief and pain as the 
U.S. rattles its sabers and threatens monumental attacks on 
Iraq," wrote Jack of the Alberni Social Justice Group. "We 
wonder why the U.S. government appears to be so completely 
out of touch with the majority of world opinion."

Jo Anne wrote: "In this time of despair and shame because of 
the terror acted on the people of Afghanistan, Colombia, 
Iraq and other U.S. targets, it is so good to see a powerful 
and respected figure speak out against the madness. Every 
Friday we vigil for one hour in our little city, praying and 
raising our spirits for peace. We cannot have peace while 
the president bullies and terrorizes the world."

Peter from Berlin added: "It's horrible to read and to 
listen to all the news from your country every day. It makes 
me and all my friends sick in our mind that a country which 
pretends to represent freedom and democracy behaves like an 
imperialistic and fascistic regime! However, it is not only 
Bush, it's our [Social Democratic-Green Party coalition] 
government too, which so many progressive people had a lot 
of expectations in. And now they have disappointed so many 
peace-loving people.

"I'm so glad to see that an opposition exists in the U.S. 
against this nightmare."

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to 
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but 
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact 
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the voice of 
resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)





------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to